2009
DOI: 10.2190/ec.41.3.c
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Assisting Teachers' Thinking and Participation Online

Abstract: This study examines online messages in a discussion forum that a group of K-12 history teachers used to discuss curriculum implementations as part of their professional development. It has 3 main research foci. First, it focuses on identifying the types of assistances provided to the teachers in an online forum. Second, it examines teachers' cognitive thinking levels exemplified in their online messages. Third, it investigates the relationship between the assistance provided to teachers and the thinking levels… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3
2
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 24 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Products of PD would then bring no impact but rather to the lack of congruence between the increasing demands for students' complex twenty-first century skills and teacher competencies. Acknowledging these shortcomings, researchers have been constantly advising PD developers to involve teachers in the planning and enactment of PD practices (Hirsh and Hord 2010;Kale et al 2009). Additionally, it should promote a deepened collaborative reflection that embraces the nature of action research (Lopez-Pastor et al 2011) and create a dialogue about "expectations, struggles and questions about teaching and learning" (Martin and Scantelbury 2009, p. 127).…”
Section: Valuing Practitioner Research-based Professional Developmentmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Products of PD would then bring no impact but rather to the lack of congruence between the increasing demands for students' complex twenty-first century skills and teacher competencies. Acknowledging these shortcomings, researchers have been constantly advising PD developers to involve teachers in the planning and enactment of PD practices (Hirsh and Hord 2010;Kale et al 2009). Additionally, it should promote a deepened collaborative reflection that embraces the nature of action research (Lopez-Pastor et al 2011) and create a dialogue about "expectations, struggles and questions about teaching and learning" (Martin and Scantelbury 2009, p. 127).…”
Section: Valuing Practitioner Research-based Professional Developmentmentioning
confidence: 99%