2011
DOI: 10.3109/10641963.2010.549269
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Associated Factors of Home Versus Ambulatory Heart Rate Variability in the General Population: The Ohasama Study

Abstract: We previously demonstrated that heart rate (HR) variability obtained by daytime ambulatory monitoring and that of daily home measurement associated differently with cardiovascular mortality risk; cardiovascular mortality was linked with decreased daytime ambulatory HR variability and increased day-by-day home HR variability. The aim of this study was to identify factors contributing to each variability, clarifying possible reasons for their different predictive values. We obtained daytime ambulatory HR and hom… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

1
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 25 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…On the contrary, we have previously demonstrated a positive association between day-to-day HR variability and the risk of cardiovascular events [1,2]. It has also been reported that the mechanism underlying short-term HR variability is different from that underlying day-to-day variability in home HR measurements [32]. Therefore, in contrast to short-term HR variability, day-to-day HR variability may be positively associated with elevated NT-proBNP.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 72%
“…On the contrary, we have previously demonstrated a positive association between day-to-day HR variability and the risk of cardiovascular events [1,2]. It has also been reported that the mechanism underlying short-term HR variability is different from that underlying day-to-day variability in home HR measurements [32]. Therefore, in contrast to short-term HR variability, day-to-day HR variability may be positively associated with elevated NT-proBNP.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 72%