2021
DOI: 10.1088/1748-9326/abe4f7
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Association between county-level coal-fired power plant pollution and racial disparities in preterm births from 2000 to 2018

Abstract: Coal has historically been a primary energy source in the United States (U.S.). The byproducts of coal combustion, such as fine particulate matter (PM2.5), have increasingly been associated with adverse birth outcomes. The goal of this study was to leverage the current progressive transition away from coal in the U.S. to assess whether coal PM2.5 is associated with preterm birth (PTB) rates and whether this association differs by maternal Black/White race/ethnicity. Using a novel dispersion modeling approach, … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
9
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 36 publications
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Additionally, peaker plants can place a disproportionate environmental burden on historically marginalized groups. 72 74 For example, the Hanford 2 peaker plant sits in a census tract where the PM 2.5 concentrations are in the 99th percentile for the United States and nearly half of the population is Hispanic or Latino. 75 Based on our analysis, this plant is potentially the most profitable target for replacement with a BESS.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Additionally, peaker plants can place a disproportionate environmental burden on historically marginalized groups. 72 74 For example, the Hanford 2 peaker plant sits in a census tract where the PM 2.5 concentrations are in the 99th percentile for the United States and nearly half of the population is Hispanic or Latino. 75 Based on our analysis, this plant is potentially the most profitable target for replacement with a BESS.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These findings are consistent with prior studies. ,, However, given the limited size of the frequency regulation market and the forecasted growth of energy storage in California, the value of frequency regulation may decrease in the future. ,,, A remaining question is whether the social benefits of energy storage can compensate for the declining value of frequency regulation. Additionally, peaker plants can place a disproportionate environmental burden on historically marginalized groups. For example, the Hanford 2 peaker plant sits in a census tract where the PM 2.5 concentrations are in the 99th percentile for the United States and nearly half of the population is Hispanic or Latino . Based on our analysis, this plant is potentially the most profitable target for replacement with a BESS.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Individuals may be affected by numerous sources of pollution that may not be registered by an ambient air pollution monitor, such as their proximity to traffic [31][32][33]. Other sources of exposures which affect human health are cooking emissions [34][35][36], power plants emissions [37], wildfires [38], and air pollutants generated from active and passive tobacco smoke [39].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…16 Among a growing body of literature evaluating associations between pregnant people living near power plants and adverse birth outcomes, all nine studies (with seven studies located in the United States: California, Florida, New Jersey, Tennessee, Wisconsin, and eastern region of the United States) suggest adverse associations. 15,[17][18][19][20][21][22][23][24] However, few of these studies focus specifically on CFPPs and PTB, and none are based in NC.…”
Section: What This Study Addsmentioning
confidence: 99%