2008
DOI: 10.1016/j.mrfmmm.2008.09.014
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Association between DNA damage, DNA repair genes variability and clinical characteristics in breast cancer patients

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

4
54
1
8

Year Published

2009
2009
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
8
1
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 87 publications
(67 citation statements)
references
References 40 publications
4
54
1
8
Order By: Relevance
“…In a case-control study with more than 9,000 subjects, Pooley et al (35) found that a coding SNP (rs3218536) in one of the DNA double-strand break repair genes, XRCC2, was strongly associated with risk of developing PR-positive breast cancer. In another study, Synowiec et al (36) reported an association between the RAD51-135G/C polymorphism and PR expression (OR=6.33; 95% CI=1.15-35.01).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 93%
“…In a case-control study with more than 9,000 subjects, Pooley et al (35) found that a coding SNP (rs3218536) in one of the DNA double-strand break repair genes, XRCC2, was strongly associated with risk of developing PR-positive breast cancer. In another study, Synowiec et al (36) reported an association between the RAD51-135G/C polymorphism and PR expression (OR=6.33; 95% CI=1.15-35.01).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 93%
“…Out of the 55 abstracts retrieved through the search criteria, 25 were irrelevant, four articles [8][9][10][11] were excluded because they were conducted on overlapping populations with other eligible studies [2,3,5,12] (these excluded articles represent smaller studies performed on subsets of larger eligible studies), one study [13] was excluded given that it has not included controls in its study design, three articles [4,14,15] were reviews/meta-analyses, and three studies [16][17][18] were excluded due to other reasons (two of them [16,17] were excluded due to reporting reasons, i.e. no reporting of the relevant genotype frequencies, whereas the other [18] was excluded for examining the association between other XRCC3 polymorphisms and premenopausal breast cancer risk).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…On the other hand, determined that there were polymorphic regions that were more frequently associated with melanoma skin cancer than cancer occurring in head, neck, bladder, and breast cancer. Th erefore, the eff ect of the XRCC3 gene varies in diff erent cancer types [31][32][33][34][35]. A recent study conducted in Poland focused on same genomic regions and cancer type, and has shown that the regions of interest are associated with cancer [19,20].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%