2022
DOI: 10.1080/01635581.2022.2104880
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Association between nut consumption and cancer risk: a meta-analysis

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
7
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 38 publications
1
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The authors reported slightly stronger inverse associations with cancer mortality for tree nuts than for peanuts [ 104 ]. These findings are in line with previous systematic reviews and meta-analyses of prospective studies [ 100 , 105 , 106 , 107 , 108 ]. For example, Chen et al [ 105 ] estimated a summary RRs for high (5+ servings/week) compared with low nut (never/almost never) consumption of 0.87 (95% CI: 0.80–0.93) for cancer mortality (11 studies 21,353 deaths), while Aune et al reported a summary estimate of 0.83 (95% CI: 0.75–0.92) per 28 g/d for cancer mortality [ 106 ].…”
Section: Tree Nuts Peanuts and Cancersupporting
confidence: 92%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The authors reported slightly stronger inverse associations with cancer mortality for tree nuts than for peanuts [ 104 ]. These findings are in line with previous systematic reviews and meta-analyses of prospective studies [ 100 , 105 , 106 , 107 , 108 ]. For example, Chen et al [ 105 ] estimated a summary RRs for high (5+ servings/week) compared with low nut (never/almost never) consumption of 0.87 (95% CI: 0.80–0.93) for cancer mortality (11 studies 21,353 deaths), while Aune et al reported a summary estimate of 0.83 (95% CI: 0.75–0.92) per 28 g/d for cancer mortality [ 106 ].…”
Section: Tree Nuts Peanuts and Cancersupporting
confidence: 92%
“…These findings are largely similar to a 2020 meta-analysis of prospective studies with the exception of breast cancer where no association with intake of total nuts was observed [ 99 ]. A 2023 meta-analysis that included only prospective studies reported an inverse association between total nut intake (highest vs. lowest) and the risk of cancers of the lung and stomach with pooled relative risks equal to 0.86 (CI: 0.81–0.91) and 0.79 (95% CI: 0.68–0.91), respectively [ 100 ]. The few cohort studies that investigated the association between nut consumption and total cancer incidence in cohorts from Europe and the USA with more than 20 years of follow-up and more than a total of 60,000 incident cancer events reported no clear association of 5+ times per week vs. never/or almost never consuming a serving of nuts [ 101 , 102 , 103 ].…”
Section: Tree Nuts Peanuts and Cancermentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Unlike in Western countries, peanuts were not traditionally widely eaten in Japan. However, the health benefits [ 25 27 ] of peanuts and tree nuts are now better appreciated, and peanut consumption among adults appears to be increasing. On the other hand, it was recently reported that the proportion of tree nuts in food-induced anaphylaxis has increased in Japan [ 28 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…16 According to the results of a metaanalysis article in 2022, an increase in nut consumption by 10 g/day is related to a reduction of overall cancer mortality by 20%. 17 In addition, the findings of another study indicated that regular consumption of walnuts is beneficial for various diseases, including cancer. 18 Jahanbani et al reported that a bio-peptide which was derived from walnut residual proteins showed remarkable anticancer potential against human colon (HT-29) and breast (MDA-MB231) cancer cell lines.…”
Section: Cancer and Nut Consumptionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Walnuts were more effectively correlated with the reduced risk of cancer mortality in comparison to all other kinds of nuts 16 . According to the results of a meta‐analysis article in 2022, an increase in nut consumption by 10 g/day is related to a reduction of overall cancer mortality by 20% 17 …”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%