2011
DOI: 10.1016/j.jcrc.2011.02.009
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Association between out-of-hospital emergency department transfer and poor hospital outcome in critically ill stroke patients

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
10
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
1
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…These patients were subsequently matched to 268 nonneurological patients. Mean age was 65.6 + 15 years, 46% were men, and median APACHE-II score was [15][16][17][18][19][20]. Within neurological group, there were 53% ICH, 35% AIS, and 12% TBI.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These patients were subsequently matched to 268 nonneurological patients. Mean age was 65.6 + 15 years, 46% were men, and median APACHE-II score was [15][16][17][18][19][20]. Within neurological group, there were 53% ICH, 35% AIS, and 12% TBI.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Patients who experienced a favorable outcome had higher GCS scores, lower APACHE II scores, lower NIHSS, and longer hospital stays. Although GCS and NIHSS are more traditional metrics, APACHE II scores have been associated with outcomes in critical neurological illness[40]. Differences in hospital length of stay may be explained by higher mortality at an earlier time point in the cohort with an unfavorable outcome, i.e., 50% of subjects with unfavorable outcome died in less than 72 hours from ICH onset.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In a recent publication by Rincon et al [12], based on a retrospective cohort analysis of 448 patients admitted with either ischemic stroke (34%) or ICH (66%), outside-ED transfer increased the odds of poor outcome two-fold. In multivariate analysis of patients transferred to ICUs, age, APACHE II (Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation) score greater than 14, GCS score less than 12, do not resuscitate (DNR) status, and outside-ED transfers were independently associated with poor outcomes.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Differences in outcomes comparing emergency department (ED) admissions with IHTs have been published in the setting of several critically ill population analyses [8][9][10][11][12][13]. Although in some instances, differences in baseline characteristics have accounted for those differences in outcomes with IHTs likely to represent a more "sick" population [11], in other reviews, the difference in baseline characteristics did not solely account for the difference in outcomes, and the outcomes stood the test of multivariate analysis.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%