1997
DOI: 10.1007/s001220050677
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Association between relationship measures based on AFLP markers, pedigree data and morphological traits in barley

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

10
91
0
7

Year Published

2001
2001
2014
2014

Publication Types

Select...
6
3
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 154 publications
(108 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
10
91
0
7
Order By: Relevance
“…Similar results were also found in oats by MOSER and LEE (1994) which observed a correlation of -0.05 between the dg (RFLP) and dm. Several reasons for this lack of correlation could include: the limited number of traits observed, the limited variation for these traits, the number of underlying genes for these traits, which may also be limited, and possible epistatic interactions between these genes (SCHUT et al, 1997).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Similar results were also found in oats by MOSER and LEE (1994) which observed a correlation of -0.05 between the dg (RFLP) and dm. Several reasons for this lack of correlation could include: the limited number of traits observed, the limited variation for these traits, the number of underlying genes for these traits, which may also be limited, and possible epistatic interactions between these genes (SCHUT et al, 1997).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Well-distributed markers per chromosome should be used, as the accuracy of genetic distance depends on the number and distribution of markers on the genome [42]. For the purpose of measuring genetic distance, 20 well-spread markers per chromosome are probably sufficient [43].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…DNA markers have the advantage of directly detecting sequence variation among genotypes and therefore the ability to bypass the assumptions that are inherent to pedigree analysis. DNA markers may be affected by the number of markers analysed, their distribution over the genome and the accuracy in scoring the marker (Schut et al 1997). Finally, incongruities can result from the clustering process whenever clusters are non-overlapping due to which a genotype that is related to two other genotypes from separate clusters will only be grouped with the one to which it is most closely related.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%