2000
DOI: 10.4269/ajtmh.2000.63.189
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Association between seropositivity of antibodies against hepatitis a virus and Helicobacter pylori.

Abstract: Abstract. Helicobacter pylori and hepatitis A virus (HAV) are documented to share common transmission routes including fecal-oral. This study examined the association between seropositivity of antibodies against H. pylori (anti-HP) and HAV (anti-HAV) via a community-based survey of 40 randomly selected kindergartens in 10 urban and 10 rural areas. Serum samples from 2,047 healthy preschool children and 104 teachers were screened for anti-HP by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay, and for anti-HAV by microparticl… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

1
13
0

Year Published

2002
2002
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
1
13
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Because HAV is a sensitive marker of fecal exposure, correlation between HAV and H. pylori seropositivity rates would indicate similar modes of transmission for these 2 pathogens. However, although there was a significant association between the prevalence of anti-H. pylori antibodies and anti-HAV antibodies among teachers born before 1980, this was not true among children born after 1990, suggesting independent H. pylori and HAV transmission routes after 1990 (47). In fact, using the kappa statistic to measure seropositivity differences between H. pylori and HAV in 500 study subjects, 1 study reported that that was no evidence for a fecal-oral route of transmission for H. pylori (55).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 79%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Because HAV is a sensitive marker of fecal exposure, correlation between HAV and H. pylori seropositivity rates would indicate similar modes of transmission for these 2 pathogens. However, although there was a significant association between the prevalence of anti-H. pylori antibodies and anti-HAV antibodies among teachers born before 1980, this was not true among children born after 1990, suggesting independent H. pylori and HAV transmission routes after 1990 (47). In fact, using the kappa statistic to measure seropositivity differences between H. pylori and HAV in 500 study subjects, 1 study reported that that was no evidence for a fecal-oral route of transmission for H. pylori (55).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 79%
“…Recent studies also showed significantly higher prevalence of anti-H. pylori antibodies among teachers compared to children 9-15 years of age (33,47), possibly due to improved socioeconomic and environmental conditions in Taiwan between the 1980s and recent years.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The seroprevalence of HAV infection strikingly decreased from 89% in 1975 to 10% in 1991 among adolescents in the major urban city of Taiwan owing to economic success and public health education [30]. Pretolani et al suggested that both H. pylori and HAV infection may share a similar transmission pattern, which was also strongly supported by Fujisawa et al [31,32] However, negative association of H. pylori and HAV infection has been observed, which postulated that the fecal-oral route may not be the common transmission route of H. pylori [25,26,33]. The relationship between H. pylori and HAV transmission has been extensively discussed with controversial results.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…However, some contradictory findings were reported against those associations [24,25]. The relationship of seroprevalence of H. pylori and HAV infection was studied in central Taiwan, which disclosed no significant association in school-aged children [26].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…29 Further, acute infection with H. pylori during childhood is characterized by vomiting and thus gastro-oral transmission may be more common among children. 30 One of the limitations of our study was the high level of excluded children (53.3% of children < 10 years old excluded) due to missing serology, which may have biased OR estimates upward.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%