2011
DOI: 10.1016/j.radonc.2011.05.062
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Association between single nucleotide polymorphisms in the XRCC1 and RAD51 genes and clinical radiosensitivity in head and neck cancer

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
61
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 85 publications
(61 citation statements)
references
References 37 publications
0
61
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, the genotype distribution of TGFb1 T869C was significantly different from that in Chinese normal population (P , 0.001). The genotype distribution of TGFb1, XRCC3 and ATM frequencies of XRCC3 722C.T (0.09 in (24)(25)(26). Such a phenomenon may be resulted from racial difference.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…However, the genotype distribution of TGFb1 T869C was significantly different from that in Chinese normal population (P , 0.001). The genotype distribution of TGFb1, XRCC3 and ATM frequencies of XRCC3 722C.T (0.09 in (24)(25)(26). Such a phenomenon may be resulted from racial difference.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Radiation-induced pulmonary side effects remain a significant clinical concern [2][3][4], thus research to reveal assays predictive of response to radiotherapy remains at the forefront of molecular radiation oncology [28][29][30]. Recent evidence indicates that interpatient variation in the development of side effects after cancer radiotherapy can not be explained, to a clinically relevant effect, by polymorphisms in individual candidate genes [31], therefore alternative approaches to investigating the genetic basis of radiotherapy side effects are needed [32].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…SNP-based toxicity risk has been studied using both candidate gene and genome-wide association approaches [95,96]. To date, the use of SNPs as mucositis risk predictors has been evaluated in a relatively small number of studies [95,[97][98][99][100][101].…”
Section: Advances In Mucosal Injury Risk Predictionmentioning
confidence: 99%