2006
DOI: 10.5070/d32wt2t8hm
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Association between solitary keratoacanthoma and cigarette smoking: A case-control study

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

2
4
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
2
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Compared with those younger than 50 years, participants in our study who were 60 years or older had a 6-fold greater risk of developing KA. Other studies have reported the age at diagnosis to range between 64 and 71 years . In our study, men had an approximately 1.5-fold higher risk of developing KA compared with women.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 90%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…Compared with those younger than 50 years, participants in our study who were 60 years or older had a 6-fold greater risk of developing KA. Other studies have reported the age at diagnosis to range between 64 and 71 years . In our study, men had an approximately 1.5-fold higher risk of developing KA compared with women.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 90%
“…In our study, men had an approximately 1.5-fold higher risk of developing KA compared with women. Other studies have reported male to female ratios ranging from 1.2:1 to 2:1 …”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…This corresponds with earlier research showing that men develop more KAs than do women ( 17 , 20 , 26 ). Similar to the current study, previous reports have shown that the incidence of KA increases with age ( 15 , 17 , 20 , 27 ). Participants with KA commonly had a sun-sensitive phenotype and a past history of actinic keratoses and other keratinocyte cancers, which supports aetiological theories of high cumulative sun exposure on a background of phenotypic susceptibility (probably genetic) ( 17 , 20 , 28 30 ).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 92%