1992
DOI: 10.1007/3-540-55693-1_40
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Association merging in a schema metaintegration system for a heterogeneous Object-Oriented database environment

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

1992
1992
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…So the work is distributed on a number of programmers and analysts in every section, so each employee show his work to his peers without resorting to any purely detailed software. This may be due to topic confidentiality and the exerted time in execution work actions, and employee importance himself in completion the issue, and to connect this idea to his boss and director [3].…”
Section: Actions Performance Within the Automatic Systems Management mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…So the work is distributed on a number of programmers and analysts in every section, so each employee show his work to his peers without resorting to any purely detailed software. This may be due to topic confidentiality and the exerted time in execution work actions, and employee importance himself in completion the issue, and to connect this idea to his boss and director [3].…”
Section: Actions Performance Within the Automatic Systems Management mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, taking into account that the integration process relies mainly on the semantics associated with data elements of dierent schemata, it is more advantageous to do it with semantically richer schemata. For the integration process this component uses a terminological system, unlike other work such as [3] or [8], which use the entity relationship model, or [32], which uses the object oriented data model. The integration process is not based solely on the notion of Real World State (RWS), that is, the semantic of correspondence assertions among data elements of dierent databases is dened referring not only to the real world counterpart of elements in the schema as in [3], [8].…”
Section: Examplementioning
confidence: 99%