2009
DOI: 10.1016/j.micpath.2009.09.011
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Association of biofilm formation and methicillin-resistance with accessory gene regulator (agr) loci in Greek Staphylococcus aureus clones

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

2
16
0
2

Year Published

2012
2012
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 25 publications
(20 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
2
16
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Cafiso et al () and Post et al () have reported that isolates of agr II tend to be strong biofilm producers, while agr I isolates were described as weak biofilm producers. In contrast, our data indicates that many isolates of agr I had strong biofilm formation ability, which is in agreement with the results by Ikonomidis et al () and Melchior et al (). This difference may be partly related to the geographic origin or isolate source.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 94%
“…Cafiso et al () and Post et al () have reported that isolates of agr II tend to be strong biofilm producers, while agr I isolates were described as weak biofilm producers. In contrast, our data indicates that many isolates of agr I had strong biofilm formation ability, which is in agreement with the results by Ikonomidis et al () and Melchior et al (). This difference may be partly related to the geographic origin or isolate source.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 94%
“…In addition, typically of agr type I strains, the majority of our isolates did not produce biofilm in bovine milk serum (Ikonomidis et al . ; Melchior et al . ).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although we currently have no simple explanation for this observation with these particular strains, this may well reflect differences in the nature and/or the biophysical properties of the biofilm produced, ultimately affecting antibiotic bioavailability and/or expression of activity. The mechanisms of biofilm formation indeed depend on different regulatory pathways in MSSA and MRSA (52,53), with specific determinants like the agr group, polysaccharide intercellular adhesin production, and spa types being more determinant for the capacity to produce slime than the expression of microbial surface components recognizing adhesive matrix molecules (MSCRAMM) (4,54,55). The nature of the biofilm matrix can differ among strains as well, with some producing a polysaccharide-based matrix under the control of the ica locus and others producing a protein-based matrix (4).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%