1999
DOI: 10.1007/pl00011765
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Association of Foreign DNA with Sperm of Gilthead Seabream, Sparus aurata, After Sonication, Freezing, and Dimethyl Sulfoxide Treatments

Abstract: : The association of foreign DNA with gilthead seabream (Sparus aurata) sperm was enhanced relative to simple coincubation by sonication, freezing, dimethyl sulfoxide and polyethylene glycol treatments. Sonication yielded the strongest dot blot signals, equivalent to 250 to 380 foreign DNA copies per spermatozoa. We are unaware of previous reports attempting to associate DNA with ultrasound for fish or elsewhere. However, no or negligible foreign DNA was evident in 1- and 2-day-old fish larvae resulting from e… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

1
4
0

Year Published

2000
2000
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

1
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
(22 reference statements)
1
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…While the effect on initial cleavage was not consistent, bovine blastocyst development was significantly reduced after IVF with DMSO-treated sperm. This indicates some damaging effect of DMSO on sperm integrity and capacity to contribute towards normal development, similar to what has been described in fish (Liu et al 1999). This damage could be alleviated by the inclusion of lipofectamine (DM3/LP1 in Table 1).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 77%
“…While the effect on initial cleavage was not consistent, bovine blastocyst development was significantly reduced after IVF with DMSO-treated sperm. This indicates some damaging effect of DMSO on sperm integrity and capacity to contribute towards normal development, similar to what has been described in fish (Liu et al 1999). This damage could be alleviated by the inclusion of lipofectamine (DM3/LP1 in Table 1).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 77%
“…In the short±medium term, the prospects of developing commercially valuable ®sh lines with genetic engineering appear to be remote for various technical and social reasons, including the lack of ef®cient transformation vectors (Knibb 1997;Knibb, Moav & Elizur 1994, Knibb et al 1998aLiu, Zohar & Knibb 1999). In the short±medium term, the prospects of developing commercially valuable ®sh lines with genetic engineering appear to be remote for various technical and social reasons, including the lack of ef®cient transformation vectors (Knibb 1997;Knibb, Moav & Elizur 1994, Knibb et al 1998aLiu, Zohar & Knibb 1999).…”
Section: Genetic Engineeringmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the short–medium term, the prospects of developing commercially valuable fish lines with genetic engineering appear to be remote for various technical and social reasons, including the lack of efficient transformation vectors (Knibb 1997; Knibb, Moav & Elizur 1994, Knibb et al . 1998a; Liu, Zohar & Knibb 1999).…”
Section: Genetic Engineeringmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Good SMGT results for fish were obtained only when semen was electroporated, as demonstrated for tilapia Oreochromis niloticus [14], zebrafish Danio rerio [15], salmon Oncorhynchus tshawytscha [16], grass carp Ctenopharyngodon idellus [17], and silver sea bream Sparus sarba [3]. However, if semen was incubated with exogenous DNA but not electroporated, the efficiency of SMGT for transgenic fish production was low or nonexistent [17][18][19][20]. The only exception was that Khoo et al [21] reported high rates of transgenic zebrafish production by incubating spermatozoa directly with exogenous DNA.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%