2021
DOI: 10.1016/j.ekir.2021.05.007
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Association of High-Density Lipoprotein Cholesterol With GFR Decline in a General Nondiabetic Population

Abstract: This is a PDF file of an article that has undergone enhancements after acceptance, such as the addition of a cover page and metadata, and formatting for readability, but it is not yet the definitive version of record. This version will undergo additional copyediting, typesetting and review before it is published in its final form, but we are providing this version to give early visibility of the article. Please note that, during the production process, errors may be discovered which could affect the content, a… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

4
2
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 52 publications
4
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In addition, we also indicated associations between eGFR (negative association) and the CKD273 classifier (positive association) with HDL-C. Similar findings were reported in middle-aged (58 ± 3.8 years) nondiabetic individuals with pre-existing CKD, in which elevated HDL-C levels were associated with an accelerated decline in eGFR [43]. These results are further supported by studies in the general population [44] and in individuals with nondialysis CKD [45], that indicate a U-shaped relationship between HDL-C and the progression of kidney disease.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 87%
“…In addition, we also indicated associations between eGFR (negative association) and the CKD273 classifier (positive association) with HDL-C. Similar findings were reported in middle-aged (58 ± 3.8 years) nondiabetic individuals with pre-existing CKD, in which elevated HDL-C levels were associated with an accelerated decline in eGFR [43]. These results are further supported by studies in the general population [44] and in individuals with nondialysis CKD [45], that indicate a U-shaped relationship between HDL-C and the progression of kidney disease.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 87%
“…The unique sample weighting procedures outlined in the NHANES survey methods and analytic guidelines allowed us to extrapolate our findings to the greater US population, increasing generalizability and power in our study. While our results are similar to recent findings by Melsom et al [19], our study included both metabolically healthy and unhealthy individuals from a racially and ethnically diverse sample. Our study was limited by the cross-sectional nature of the data, which reduces our understanding of HDL-c's role in the progression of CKD.…”
Section: Strengths and Limitationssupporting
confidence: 90%
“…The relationship was attenuated when considering the middle 50% of HDL-c values for the total and healthy samples yet persisted in the MetS sample. Prior research findings linking HDL-c and eGFR have produced mixed results, with studies reporting a broad range of associations including a positive relationship between HDL-c and eGFR [11][12][13][14], a U-shaped, or biphasic, relationship between HDL-c and eGFR [16], and a negative relationship, similar to the findings of the present study [18,19]. While most research in this area has been conducted in populations free of metabolic disease, our study demonstrates a negative relationship between HDL-c and eGFR in the overall sample, as well as in the metabolically healthy and unhealthy subsamples.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 69%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In the general middle-aged nondiabetic population, higher HDL-C levels (> 1.6 mmol/L) were independently associated with rapid loss of eGFR. Elevated HDL-C levels are associated with an increased risk of sharp declines in GFR and rapid declines in GFR [ 30 ]. In contrast to high HDL-C, a low serum HDL-C level (0.99 ± 0.14 mmol/L) was significantly associated with a greater than 30% decrease in eGFR or ESRD (HR 4.80, P < 0.01).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%