1979
DOI: 10.1002/art.1780220504
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Association of IgG Anti‐Brain Antibodies with Central Nervous System Dysfunction in Systemic Lupus Erythematosus

Abstract: Sera from 20 patients with systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) and active central nervous system (CNS) dysfunction were examined by indirect immunofluorescence for antibodies to neuronal membrane determinants. Warm‐reactive IgG antibodies were demonstrable in 82% (9/11) of patients with clinical evidence for seizures or diffuse CNS disease, but these antibodies generally were absent in non‐CNS SLE sera or when focal neurologic deficit or psychosis was the primary CNS manifestation. Cold‐reactive antibodies of t… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3

Citation Types

2
29
0
2

Year Published

1979
1979
1998
1998

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 126 publications
(33 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
2
29
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…However, the demonstration of antineuronal antibody activity in some patients without NP-SLE and the absence of this activity in some patients with NP-SLE (Tables 1 and 2 To explain the absence of antineuronal antibodies in some patients with clinical NP-SLE, one might hypothesize that in a significant subset of these patients, the pathogenesis of NP-SLE is not antibodymediated. This subset would probably include patients with focal manifestations, since the titer of antineuronal binding in these patients is considerably lower than in those with diffuse NP-SLE (Figure l), a trend noted previously by both Wilson (9) …”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 69%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…However, the demonstration of antineuronal antibody activity in some patients without NP-SLE and the absence of this activity in some patients with NP-SLE (Tables 1 and 2 To explain the absence of antineuronal antibodies in some patients with clinical NP-SLE, one might hypothesize that in a significant subset of these patients, the pathogenesis of NP-SLE is not antibodymediated. This subset would probably include patients with focal manifestations, since the titer of antineuronal binding in these patients is considerably lower than in those with diffuse NP-SLE (Figure l), a trend noted previously by both Wilson (9) …”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 69%
“…A number of investigators have recently examined the clinical relevance of antibodies that react with brain-associated antigens in patients with clinically defined NP-SLE (4)(5)(6)(7)(8)(9)(10). Increased levels of lymphocytotoxins that cross-react with neuronal antigens in SLE sera or cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) have been shown to be associated with active neuropsychiatric disease (4-6).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Classifications that merely state that the disease was active if 1 or 2 systems were "involved" (24)(25)(26)(27)(28)(29) can have serious drawbacks. Initially, the University College Hospital (UCH) Middlesex lupus study group categorized the disease as inactive, mild, or severely active (13).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, circulating anti-brain antibodies have been demonstrated in systemic lupus erythematosus (25)(26)(27)(28). Immune complexes lodged in the choroid plexus of patients with this disease might induce a change in the permeability of the choroid plexus, allowing entry of circulating anti-brain antibodies normally excluded from the central nervous system.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%