2009
DOI: 10.1007/s00125-009-1500-y
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Association of KCNQ1 gene polymorphism with gestational diabetes mellitus in a Chinese population

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

4
21
1

Year Published

2010
2010
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 26 publications
(27 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
4
21
1
Order By: Relevance
“…While we were preparing this paper, two similar reports regarding KCNQ1 and GDM were published [25,26]. The report of Shin et al [25] used our allele frequency data of the control subjects that was previously published [1].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…While we were preparing this paper, two similar reports regarding KCNQ1 and GDM were published [25,26]. The report of Shin et al [25] used our allele frequency data of the control subjects that was previously published [1].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…The number of women with GDM included in these studies ranged greatly from 25 (Low, Mohd Tohit, Chong, & Idris, 2010) to 930 (Shin et al, 2010). Sample size powered at least 80% was reported in only 6 of 24 studies (King, 2007;Lauenborg et al, 2009;Pappa et al, 2011;Shaat et al, 2005;Zhou et al, 2009). Most studies compared genetic variants between pregnant women with GDM (cases) and pregnant women with normoglycemia (controls).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…The C allele of the rs2237892 was associated with GDM in two Korean studies (Kwak et al, 2010;Shin et al, 2010) but not in the Chinese study (Zhou et al, 2009). Instead, rs2237896 and rs2237895 were associated with GDM in a Chinese population (Zhou et al, 2009). Both rs2237892 and rs2237895 were associated with decreased insulin secretion but not with insulin resistance, indicating KCNQ1 conferring a risk for GDM by altering pancreatic beta cell function (Kwak et al, 2010).…”
Section: Kcnq1mentioning
confidence: 94%
See 2 more Smart Citations