Association of Parenteral Anticoagulation Therapy With Outcomes in Chinese Patients Undergoing Percutaneous Coronary Intervention for Non–ST-Segment Elevation Acute Coronary Syndrome

Abstract

The association of parenteral anticoagulation therapy with improved outcomes in patients with non-ST-segment elevation acute coronary syndrome was previously established. This benefit has not been evaluated in the era of dual antiplatelet therapy and percutaneous coronary intervention. OBJECTIVE To evaluate the association between parenteral anticoagulation therapy and clinical outcomes in patients with non-ST-segment elevation acute coronary syndrome undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS This cohort study included 8197 adults who underwent percutaneous coronary intervention for non-ST-segment elevation acute coronary syndrome from January 1, 2010, to December 31, 2014, at 5 medical centers in China. Patients receiving parenteral anticoagulation therapy only after percutaneous coronary intervention were excluded. EXPOSURES Parenteral anticoagulation therapy. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES The primary outcome was in-hospital all-cause death and in-hospital major bleeding as defined by the Bleeding Academic Research Consortium definition (grades 3-5). RESULTS Of 6804 patients who met the final criteria, 5104 (75.0%) were male, with a mean (SD) age of 64.2 (10.4) years. The incidence of in-hospital death was not significantly different between the patients who received and did not receive parenteral anticoagulation therapy (0.3% vs 0.1%; P = .13) (adjusted odds ratio, 1.27; 95% CI, 0.38-4.27; P = .70). A similar result was found for myocardial infarction (0.3% vs 0.3%; P = .82) (adjusted odds ratio, 0.77; 95% CI, 0.29-2.07; P = .61). In-hospital major bleeding was more frequent in the parenteral anticoagulation group (2.5% vs 1.0%; P < .001) (adjusted odds ratio, 1.94; 95% CI, 1.24-3.03; P = .004). At a median (interquartile range) follow-up of 2.96 years (1.93-4.46 years), all-cause death was not significantly different between the 2 groups (adjusted hazards ratio, 0.87; 95% CI, 0.71-1.07; P = .19), but the incidence of major bleeding was higher in the parenteral anticoagulation group (adjusted hazards ratio, 1.43; 95% CI, 1.01-2.02; P = .04). The propensity score analysis confirmed these primary analyses. CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE In the patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention for non-ST-segment elevation acute coronary syndrome, parenteral anticoagulation therapy was not associated with a lower risk of all-cause death or myocardial infarction but was significantly associated with a higher risk of major bleeding. These findings raise important safety questions about the current practice of routine parenteral anticoagulation therapy while we await randomized trials of this practice.

Prognostic of different glomerular filtration rate formulas in patients receiving percutaneous coronary intervention: insights from a multicenter observational cohort

“…NSTE-ACS includes unstable angina pectoris (UA) and non-ST segment elevation myocardial infarction (NSTEMI). These definitions were consistent with our published study [11]. Patients for whom an eGFR could be calculated by the five formulas mentioned previously were included.…”

“…The present study originated from an observational cohort whose protocol were detailed in our previous study [11]. All 8197 patients who were recruited retrospectively from 5 centers in China were consecutively enrolled from January 1, 2010, to December 31, 2014.…”

“…Patients' information was collected as we described in our previous study [11], and including preoperative creatinine level, age, sex, Cys-C, urea nitrogen, type of ACS (NSTEMI or UA), patient history, characteristic medications used during hospitalization, clinical presentation laboratory tests (NT-proBNP, peak troponin I, hemoglobin), and echocardiography. In-hospital, 30 day, 1-year and 3-year follow-up data were obtained by trained nurses through telephone interviews from November 7, 2015 to December 30, 2016.…”

Impact of infection in patients with non-ST elevation acute coronary syndrome undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention: insight from a multicentre observational cohort from China

“…The method used to search and identify appropriate patients with NSTE-ACS has been outlined previously. 11 …”

“…The details of clinical events and follow-up have been previously described. 11 All adverse clinical events were evaluated by an independent clinical events committee that was masked to the details of infection.…”