Association of Race and Ethnicity and Medicare Program Type With Ambulatory Care Access and Quality Measures

Abstract

IMPORTANCEThere are racial inequities in health care access and quality in the United States. It is unknown whether such differences for racial and ethnic minority beneficiaries differ between Medicare Advantage and traditional Medicare or whether access and quality are better for minority beneficiaries in 1 of the 2 programs. OBJECTIVE To compare differences in rates of enrollment, ambulatory care access, and ambulatory care quality by race and ethnicity in Medicare Advantage vs traditional Medicare. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS Exploratory observational cohort study of a nationally representative sample of 45 833 person-years (26 887 persons) in the Medicare Current Beneficiary Survey from 2015 to 2018, comparing differences in program enrollment and measures of access and quality by race and ethnicity. EXPOSURES Minority race and ethnicity (Black, Hispanic, Native American, or Asian/Pacific Islander) vs White or multiracial; Medicare Advantage vs traditional Medicare enrollment. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURESSix patient-reported measures of ambulatory care access (whether a beneficiary had a usual source of care in the past year, had a primary care clinician usual source of care, or had a specialist visit) and quality (influenza vaccination, pneumonia vaccination, and colon cancer screening). RESULTSThe final sample included 6023 persons (mean age, 68.9 [SD, 12.6] years; 57.3% women) from minority groups and 20 864 persons (mean age, 71.9 [SD, 10.8] years; 54.9% women) from White or multiracial groups, who accounted for 9816 and 36 017 person-years, respectively. Comparing Medicare Advantage vs traditional Medicare among minority beneficiaries, those in Medicare Advantage had significantly better rates of access to a primary care clinician usual source of care (79.1% vs 72.5%; adjusted marginal difference, 4.0%; 95% CI, 1.0%-6.9%), influenza vaccinations (67.3% vs 63.0%; adjusted marginal difference, 5.2%; 95% CI, 1.9%-8.5%), pneumonia vaccinations (70.7% vs 64.6%; adjusted marginal difference, 6.1%; 95% CI, 2.7%-9.4%), and colon cancer screenings (69.4% vs 61.1%; adjusted marginal difference, 7.1%; 95% CI, 3.8%-10.3%). Comparing minority vs White or multiracial beneficiaries across both programs, minority beneficiaries had significantly lower rates of access to a primary care clinician usual source of care (adjusted marginal difference, 4.7%; 95% CI, 2.5%-6.8%), specialist visits (adjusted marginal difference, 10.8%; 95% CI, 8.3%-13.3%), influenza vaccinations (adjusted marginal difference, 4.3%; 95% CI, 1.2%-7.4%), and pneumonia vaccinations (adjusted marginal difference, 6.4%; 95% CI, 3.9%-9.0%). The interaction of race and ethnicity with insurance type was not statistically significant for any of the 6 outcome measures. CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCEIn this exploratory study of Medicare beneficiaries in 2015-2018, enrollment in Medicare Advantage vs traditional Medicare was significantly associated with better outcomes for access and quality among minority beneficiaries; however, minority beneficiaries were si...

Association of State Medicaid Expansion Status With Rates of Suicide Among US Adults

“… 42 Minority communities continue to have lower rates of ambulatory care access and quality compared with White or multiracial beneficiaries. 43 Thus, even with the improvement of insurance coverage across the board, persistent structural and socioeconomic inequities within minority communities, some of which are suicide risk factors (eg, unemployment and lack of housing), may be limiting its effect on mortality. 30 , 44 , 45 These factors may elucidate why our study revealed nonsignificant changes in suicide rates among Black individuals.…”

Conceptualizing, Contextualizing, and Operationalizing Race in Quantitative Health Sciences Research

“…56,57 Their health outcomes are analyzed in aggregate and compared with those of other racial groups. 58 In the JAMA special edition, 3 of 4 original investigations [59][60][61] included "Hispanic" as the only ethnic group without further disaggregation. This represents a significant limitation in health equity literature as use of this category often results in the combining of multiple, heterogeneous populations spanning dozens of countries and racial groups as well as highly variable socioeconomic, political, and cultural contexts.…”

Disparities in Health Care Spending and Utilization Among Black and White Medicaid Enrollees

“… 1 , 2 , 3 , 4 , 5 , 6 , 7 , 8 While expanding health insurance coverage reduces disparities, 9 , 10 , 11 , 12 , 13 , 14 , 15 substantial unexplained variation remains. Prior studies found that racial disparities persist among US children and adults with the same sources of health insurance 16 , 17 , 18 , 19 , 20 and those treated by the same health systems. 21 …”