Association of the US Affordable Care Act With Out-of-Pocket Spending and Catastrophic Health Expenditures Among Adult Patients With Traumatic Injury

Abstract

IMPORTANCE Trauma is an expensive and unpredictable source of out-of-pocket spending for American families. The Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act (ACA) sought to improve financial protection by expanding health insurance coverage, but its association with health care spending for patients with traumatic injury remains largely unknown.OBJECTIVE To evaluate the association of ACA implementation with out-of-pocket spending, premiums, and catastrophic health expenditures (CHE) among adult patients with traumatic injury. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTSData from a nationally representative sample of US adults aged 19 to 64 years who had a hospital stay or emergency department visit for a traumatic injury from January 2010 to December 2017 were analyzed using the Medical Expenditure Panel Survey.Multivariable generalized linear models were used to evaluate changes in spending after ACA implementation. Additionally, 4 income subgroups were evaluated based on ACA thresholds for program eligibility: lowest-income patients (earning 138% or less of the federal poverty level [FPL]), low-income patients (earning 139% to 250% of the FPL), middle-income patients (earning 251% to 400% of the FPL), and high-income patients (earning more than 400% of the FPL). Data were MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES Out-of-pocket spending, premium spending, out-of-pocket plus premium spending, and likelihood of experiencing CHE, defined as out-of-pocket plus premium spending exceeding 19.5% of family income. RESULTSOf the 6288 included patients, 2995 (weighted percentage, 51.3%) were male, and the mean (SD) age was 41.4 (12.8) years. Implementation of the ACA was associated with 31% lower odds of CHE (adjusted odds ratio, 0.69; 95% CI, 0.54 to 0.87; P = .002). Changes were greatest in lowest-income patients, who experienced 30% lower out-of-pocket spending (adjusted percentage change, −30.4%; 95% CI, −46.6% to −9.4%; P = .01), 26% lower out-of-pocket plus premium spending (adjusted percentage change, −26.3%; 95% CI, −41.0% to −8.1%; P = .01), and 39% lower odds of CHE (adjusted odds ratio, 0.61; 95% CI, 0.44 to 0.84; P = .002). Low-income patients experienced decreased out-of-pocket spending and out-of-pocket plus premium spending but no changes in CHE, while middle-income and high-income patients experienced no significant changes in any spending outcome. In the post-ACA period, 1 in 11 of all patients with traumatic injury and 1 in 5 with the lowest incomes continued to experience CHE each year.CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE Implementation of the ACA was associated with improved financial protection for US adults with traumatic injury, especially lowest-income individuals targeted (continued) Key Points Question Was the implementation of the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act (ACA) associated with improved financial protection for US adults receiving care for traumatic injuries? Findings In this cross-sectional study of 6288 adult patients with traumatic injury, implementation of the ACA was associated with 31% lower odds of catastroph...

Improvements and Gaps in Financial Risk Protection Among Veterans Following the Affordable Care Act

“…9,10 More directly, analyses of patient expenditures have shown an association between ACA implementation and decreased outof-pocket spending as well as risk of catastrophic health expenditures. [11][12][13][14][15] Veterans have different options for healthcare financing than the broader US population. For example, through the Veterans Health Administration (VHA), veterans with a service-related condition or meeting income eligibility thresholds may qualify for care with minimal to no cost sharing.…”

Benefits and Limitations of Business Process Model Notation in Modeling Patient Healthcare Trajectory: A Scoping Review Protocol

“…With the continuous challenges facing healthcare organizations in the past few years [1][2][3] , many interventions have focused on process improvements with the objective of enhancing e ciency and e cacy to improve patient outcomes while controlling costs 4,5 . Through the years, health expenditure and nancing has increased substantially in developed countries such as the United States (US) and Canada [6][7][8][9] . In 2019, Canada spent 10.8% of its gross domestic product on healthcare expenses according to the Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD) 9 .…”

<p>The Repeal of the Affordable Care Act and Its Likely Impact on Chronic Pain Patients: “Have You No Shame?”</p>

“…47 Although the ACA has been much-maligned primarily for political purposes, research demonstrates that it reduces out-of-pocket expenses for health care dramaticallyparticularly for lower-income individuals. 48 Consequent to this research coupled with a divisive lack of trust for the current administration, 49 a recent Kaiser Family Foundation poll predictably indicated that a clear majority of Americans are now in favor of the ACA. 50 Perhaps more significant is the poll's finding that 72% believe that it is "very important" to guard against the prohibition of the ACA's clause that prevents health insurers from denying coverage for people with pre-existing conditions.…”