1997
DOI: 10.1016/s0092-8674(00)80472-9
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Association of Transcriptionally Silent Genes with Ikaros Complexes at Centromeric Heterochromatin

Abstract: Ikaros proteins are required for normal T, B, and NK cell development and are postulated to activate lymphocyte-specific gene expression. Here we examined Ikaros distribution in the nucleus of B lymphocytes using confocal microscopy and a novel immunofluorescence in situ hybridization (immuno-FISH) approach. Unexpectedly, Ikaros localized to discrete heterochromatin-containing foci in interphase nuclei, which comprise clusters of centromeric DNA as defined by gamma-satellite sequences and the abundance of hete… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

29
583
1
13

Year Published

1999
1999
2008
2008

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 708 publications
(626 citation statements)
references
References 60 publications
29
583
1
13
Order By: Relevance
“…In approximately one third of resting CD4 T cells isolated freshly ex vivo, the GATA-3 locus was associated with centromeric heterochromatin domains, as defined by a csatellite repeat probe (the major satellite repeat sequences that define centromeric heterochromatin in the mouse) [4]. Association of GATA-3 with centromeric heterochromatin was seen in a similar fraction of CD4 T cells activated in vitro for 3-4 days under nonpolarizing conditions (Fig.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 80%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In approximately one third of resting CD4 T cells isolated freshly ex vivo, the GATA-3 locus was associated with centromeric heterochromatin domains, as defined by a csatellite repeat probe (the major satellite repeat sequences that define centromeric heterochromatin in the mouse) [4]. Association of GATA-3 with centromeric heterochromatin was seen in a similar fraction of CD4 T cells activated in vitro for 3-4 days under nonpolarizing conditions (Fig.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 80%
“…The developmental history of cells is reflected in epigenetic modifications [1], such as DNA (CpG) methylation [2], the packaging of DNA in chromatin, post-translational modifications of chromatin proteins [3], and the spatial partitioning of gene loci into transcriptionally permissive and repressive domains within the nucleus [4][5][6].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In fact, the chromosomal DNA showing the highest GC level is endowed with the highest gene densities, early replication during the S phase of the cell cycle, and a more open chromatin structure, in contrast to the GC-poorest DNA that has the opposite features (Ferreira et al 1997;Sadoni et al 1999;Saccone et al, 2002;Tanabe et al 2002a;Boutanaev et al 2005;Foster and Bridger 2005;Petrova et al 2006). The compartmentalization of the cell nucleus is also associated with gene expression activity, with transcripts and splicing snRNPs preferentially located at the nuclear interior, whereas the nuclear periphery, largely occupied by heterochromatin, is generally transcriptionally inactive (Strouboulis and Wolffe 1996; Brown et al 1997;Andrulis et al 1998;Cockell and Gasser 1999;Lukasova et al 2002;Foster and Bridger 2005). A striking example, in this regard, concerns the inactive X chromosome in mammalian female cells, which is typically located towards the nuclear envelope forming the very compact structure of the Barr body, but with a large number of genes located away from the bulk of the chromosome territory (Clemson et al 2006).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Nuclear positioning can be influenced by expression also for endogenous human or mouse gene loci, a fact maybe best illuminated by genes with monoallelic expression, where both genes show a different topology (Dietzel et al 1999;Takizawa et al 2008). Cases of gene repositioning upon transcriptional activation have been documented relative to their chromosome territory (Volpi et al 2000;Williams et al 2002;Chambeyron and Bickmore 2004), relative to centromeric heterochromatin (Brown et al 1997), for movement away from peripheral heterochromatin (Kosak et al 2002;Zink et al 2004;Ragoczy et al 2006;Williams et al 2006) and for other movements towards more central areas (Takizawa et al 2008). However, expression has also been reported for genes at the nuclear periphery (Nielsen et al 2002;Ragoczy et al 2006) and a study using a transgene tethered to the nuclear lamina could show that this transgene maintains transcriptional activity (Kumaran and Spector 2008).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%