2021
DOI: 10.1016/j.jsams.2020.11.003
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Associations between clinical findings and MRI injury extent in male athletes with acute adductor injuries — A cross-sectional study

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

1
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…To evaluate the associations of all explanatory variables with injury and re-injury, two models of logistic regression analyses were performed and odds ratios with 95% confidence intervals (CI) were calculated. Variable selection for logistic regression models was based on backward stepwise empirical approach removing non-significant variables using p < 0.05 as the cut-off level 23 . We started with a basic model containing all the predictors and then by removing the weakest contributor in every single model we finally developed the model containing only the variables significantly relevant for the injury or re-injury occurrence.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To evaluate the associations of all explanatory variables with injury and re-injury, two models of logistic regression analyses were performed and odds ratios with 95% confidence intervals (CI) were calculated. Variable selection for logistic regression models was based on backward stepwise empirical approach removing non-significant variables using p < 0.05 as the cut-off level 23 . We started with a basic model containing all the predictors and then by removing the weakest contributor in every single model we finally developed the model containing only the variables significantly relevant for the injury or re-injury occurrence.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Clinical revaluation has been shown to have a good correlation with MRI findings [8], with high negative predictive values shown with passive adductor stretch (100%) and with palpation pain at the adductor longus insertion (98%). Three quarters of adductor injuries are avulsions [9,10] but the subsequent care remains controversial in terms of conservative over surgical re-implantation with some advocating the size of the avulsion as a possible determinant on the choice of management [11]. However, a recent systematic review shows how surgery and conservative or non-operative management for avulsions with a mean size of 3.3cm + 0.6 gives no advantage in return to normal pre-injury activity and they also have a statistically significant longer return to sport (3.9 ± 1.5 months vs. 2.2 ± 1.0 months, P = 0.0001), so surgery has its caveats for adductor avulsion injuries [12].…”
Section: Adductor Tendinopathymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The absence of pain during passive adductor stretch and the absence of palpation pain on the proximal adductor longus insertion can be used to confidently rule out an acute complete adductor longus tendon avulsion. 17 MRI is considered the gold standard for use in the diagnosis of avulsion injuries, and detailed MRI variations of avulsion injuries are reported to potentially influence treatment decisions. 14 There is scant data to inform clinical decision making on management and whether to choose a surgical reattachment or a nonsurgical exercise-based treatment approach of these injuries.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%