2002
DOI: 10.1159/000065196
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Associations between Lateral Cephalometric Dimensions and Misarticulations of Finnish Dental Consonants in Cleft Lip/Palate Children

Abstract: The purpose of this study was to examine the associations between lateral cephalometric variables and the misarticulation of /r/, /s/ and /l/ sound in cleft lip/palate children. The subjects were 134 Finnish-speaking 6-year-old boys with isolated cleft palate (CP, n = 33), unilateral (n = 44), bilateral (BCLP, n = 19) cleft lip and cleft lip/alveolus (n = 38); /r/, /s/ and /l/ distortions were obtained from original hospital records which were based on perceptual speech follow-ups performed by experienced spee… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2008
2008
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

1
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Until now, the impact of different articulation disorders on speech intelligibility for children with clefts could not be precisely quantified [10,17,39,64], but some characteristics are yet described in detail. One typical feature of children's speech with cleft lip and palate is compensatory articulation and misarticulation which are caused by anatomic deficits [50]. In order to compensate for these deficits, some children tend to form similar but different phones.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Until now, the impact of different articulation disorders on speech intelligibility for children with clefts could not be precisely quantified [10,17,39,64], but some characteristics are yet described in detail. One typical feature of children's speech with cleft lip and palate is compensatory articulation and misarticulation which are caused by anatomic deficits [50]. In order to compensate for these deficits, some children tend to form similar but different phones.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The misarticulations were significantly more common in children with crossbites (73%) than in those without crossbites (45%) 24 . However, the anteroposterior cephalometric relationship of the maxilla and mandible of these children was not associated with dentoalveolar misarticulations 25 …”
mentioning
confidence: 84%