2016
DOI: 10.1016/j.envint.2015.12.006
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Associations between ultrafine and fine particles and mortality in five central European cities — Results from the UFIREG study

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

6
66
3
3

Year Published

2016
2016
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 108 publications
(78 citation statements)
references
References 32 publications
6
66
3
3
Order By: Relevance
“…Annette Peters reported on three recent epidemiological studies evaluating short-term exposures to UFPs. The first was a multi-city time-series study conducted in five European cities as part of the European collaboration known as UFIREG (Ultrafine particles—an evidence-based contribution to the development of regional and European environmental health policy) [8]. The UFIREG project collected daily measurements of UFPN counts and PM 2.5 to examine immediate and delayed associations with cardiopulmonary mortality and hospital admissions.…”
Section: Health Effects Evidencementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Annette Peters reported on three recent epidemiological studies evaluating short-term exposures to UFPs. The first was a multi-city time-series study conducted in five European cities as part of the European collaboration known as UFIREG (Ultrafine particles—an evidence-based contribution to the development of regional and European environmental health policy) [8]. The UFIREG project collected daily measurements of UFPN counts and PM 2.5 to examine immediate and delayed associations with cardiopulmonary mortality and hospital admissions.…”
Section: Health Effects Evidencementioning
confidence: 99%
“…This may in-turn impact physiologic responses that ultimately increase the risk of acute cardiorespiratory morbidity (Weichenthal 2012). In epidemiological studies, some have shown that ultrafine particulate matter air pollution is more strongly associated with adverse health effects when compared to larger PM diameters (Delfino et al 2009; Franck et al 2011) while other studies have shown PM 2.5 to have stronger or as strong associations as ultrafine PM (Ruckerl et al 2014; Lanzinger et al 2016). The inconsistent epidemiological evidence may be due to the fact that the sources and components of pollutants vary from study to study.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Knibbs et al, 2011;Strak et al, 2012;Ostro et al, 2015;Lanzinger et al, 2016). At the current time, there is still limited knowledge of what specific characteris-tic or association of characteristics may dominate the particle toxicity and the consequent health outcomes (Atkinson et al, 2010;Strak et al, 2012;Vu et al, 2015a); nevertheless, it is well recognised that UFPs can reach the deepest regions of the lung (Salma et al, 2015) and may have orders of magnitude higher surface-area-to-mass ratios compared to larger particles.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%