2005
DOI: 10.15288/jsa.2005.66.196
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Associations of ALDH2 and ADH1B genotypes with response to alcohol in Asian Americans.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

5
38
0

Year Published

2006
2006
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
7
1
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 51 publications
(43 citation statements)
references
References 45 publications
5
38
0
Order By: Relevance
“…50 However, not all studies have found a correlation. 51,52 A greater level of response to alcohol in those with ADH1B*2 has also been observed in some studies, 53,54 but not in others. 55 Another way of considering alcohol use is to examine drinking patterns (frequency, number of drinks per occasion), either in people with alcoholism or in a populationbased sample.…”
Section: Association Of Adh1b and Alcoholismmentioning
confidence: 79%
“…50 However, not all studies have found a correlation. 51,52 A greater level of response to alcohol in those with ADH1B*2 has also been observed in some studies, 53,54 but not in others. 55 Another way of considering alcohol use is to examine drinking patterns (frequency, number of drinks per occasion), either in people with alcoholism or in a populationbased sample.…”
Section: Association Of Adh1b and Alcoholismmentioning
confidence: 79%
“…5 Asians have lower rates of alcohol dependence and lower risk of alcoholism and related problems than non-Asians. 8,9 These findings suggest that this physiological sensitivity to alcohol, exhibited as flushing, serves as a protective factor against excessive drinking. …”
Section: Flushing Reaction and Drinking Patternsmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Reinforcing effects of substances are not only due to drug characteristics. Rather, they result from the interaction between drug-related constructs and individuals' characteristics including genetic and environmental influences (Cook et al, 2005;Ellenbroek et al, 2005;Mulligan et al, 2003;Oslin et al, 2003). After controlling for drug types and gender, two trends for familial associations were found for LOTIR and LOTIP (Tables 4 and 5).…”
Section: Familiality Of Times For Transitionsmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Part of addictive liability is likely due to an interaction between genotypes and drug characteristics, which generate pleasurable or unpleasant physiological responses (Cook et al, 2005;Mulligan et al, 2003;Oslin et al, 2003), as well as environmental factors that may moderate whether drug consumption is reinforcing (Carroll, France, & Meisch, 1979;Ellenbroek, van der Kam, van der Elst, & Cools, 2005). Clarification of genetic contributions to ontology of addiction could be greatly advanced if the addictive liability of substances could be studied in terms of the contributions of genotypes, other interpersonal characteristics, environmental factors, and the interactions between them.…”
Section: Addictive Liability Of Substances As a Source For Phenotypesmentioning
confidence: 99%