The effects of direct and indirect defenses differ among plant species, and the variation in the mode of plant defenses might reflect physiological and/or ecological constraints of each mode of defense related to the growth and reproduction of individual plant species. To evaluate the advantages and disadvantages of indirect ant-mediated defense via extrafloral nectaries (EFNs), we compared the herbivory pressure, leaf chemicals, vegetative growth, and reproduction between two species of vetches, Vicia sativa var. angustifolia (Reichard) Wahlenb (Leguminosae) with EFNs and V. hirsuta (L.) SF Gray without EFNs (or with very small EFNs). Indirect ant defense of V. sativa was not consistently reliable because of the low constancy of ant attraction. In addition, V. sativa was more vulnerable to attack by herbivores than V. hirsuta. The estimated total amount of sugars secreted by EFNs of V. sativa corresponded to 0.5% of total leaf biomass, and 0.07% of total plant biomass, indicating a low investment to the production of extrafloral nectar. Vicia sativa plants grew more rapidly than V. hirsuta plants during the reproductive stage. Therefore, we consider that V. sativa adopts the ant defense via EFNs in spite of its low reliability because the indirect ant defense supported by EFNs requires only low investment, allowing the plants to attain rapid growth in the early spring.