2019
DOI: 10.1038/s41390-019-0348-1
|View full text |Cite|
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Associations of measures of systemic blood flow used in a randomized trial of delayed cord clamping in preterm infants

Abstract: OBJECTIVE: To determine associations of low superior vena cava (SVC) flow (≤55 ml/kg/min) and low right ventricular output (RVO) (≤150 ml/kg/min) in preterm infants. DESIGN/METHODS: An observational study in infants <30 weeks gestation randomized to receive immediate (<10 s) or delayed cord clamping (DCC) (≥60 s). RESULTS: The study enrolled 265 infants with a mean (SD) gestation 28 (2) weeks. Eighty-six (33%) infants had low SVC flow and 81 (31%) infants had low RVO. In multivariate analysis, low SVC flow was… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
13
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
0
13
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Bates et al [ 20 ] could have a potential confounding factor of inter-observer variability in their retrospective study. Popat et al [ 21 ] used a different definition for low SVCF (< 55 mL/kg/min).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Bates et al [ 20 ] could have a potential confounding factor of inter-observer variability in their retrospective study. Popat et al [ 21 ] used a different definition for low SVCF (< 55 mL/kg/min).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…25 Our data represent the most recent data in a prospectively recorded group of extremely preterm infants delivered at tertiary centres across four countries. The wide variability may reflect different practices including timing of cord clamping, [25][26][27] modes of mechanical ventilation 28 (premedication and sedation) and presence of an invasive arterial line.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Bates et al (20) could have a potential confounding factor of inter-observer variability in their retrospective study. Popat et al (21) used a different de nition for low SVC ow (< 55 mL/kg/min).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%