2021
DOI: 10.3399/bjgp.2020.0823
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Associations with antibiotic prescribing for acute exacerbation of COPD in primary care: secondary analysis of a randomised controlled trial

Abstract: Background: C-reactive protein point-of-care testing (CRP-POCT) has been shown to reduce antibiotic use in patients with acute exacerbation of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (AECOPD) in primary care by 26%, without compromising patient care. Fewer than half of AECOPD patients present with bacterial aetiology and further safe reductions may be possible. Aim: To investigate the associations between presenting features and antibiotic prescribing in patients with AECOPD in UK primary care. Design and Settin… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
1
1

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The observed increase can hardly be explained by a corresponding increase in more severe RTIs. Evidence shows that CRP testing reduce antibiotic prescribing for patients with acute RTIs and acute exacerbations of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease in primary care [ 22 , 23 ]. However, there is a concern that CRP testing might also have negative effects, for instance on costs of management or re-consultation, but there is limited measurement of these outcomes [ 22 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The observed increase can hardly be explained by a corresponding increase in more severe RTIs. Evidence shows that CRP testing reduce antibiotic prescribing for patients with acute RTIs and acute exacerbations of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease in primary care [ 22 , 23 ]. However, there is a concern that CRP testing might also have negative effects, for instance on costs of management or re-consultation, but there is limited measurement of these outcomes [ 22 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Sputum purulence and sputum volume were associated with in-hospital antibiotic use, while no association was observed with dyspnea. This finding may indicate that sputum volume is used as an indicator to start antibiotics, although sputum purulence is the strongest predictor of bacterial infection among the Anthonisen criteria [ 15 ]. CRP level was the strongest determinant of in-hospital antibiotic use for which there is moderate evidence to differentiate bacterial AECOPD [ 11 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To the best of our knowledge, studies that investigated the determinants of antibiotic use for AECOPD were performed in primary care [ 14 , 15 ], or did not investigate laboratory results such as CRP [ 16 ]. Only two retrospective studies investigated the real-life effect of (guideline-recommended) antibiotics in patients hospitalized with AECOPD on outcomes, both performed in the United States [ 17 , 18 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Selective and narrow-spectrum antibiotics can be applied in some cases, but broad-spectrum antibiotics are inevitable in most clinical situations because causative organisms are not definite at initial presentation. In addition to antibiotic resistance and unnecessary side effects due to their overuse 15 , it should also be acknowledged that antibiotics are the representative treatment causing an imbalance in the intestinal microbiota. It has already been documented that the imbalance and depletion of microbiota can aggravate pulmonary infection from both bacteria 16 and viruses 17 .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%