Fatigue is a dominant feature of both acute and convalescent COVID-19 (sometimes termed ‘long-COVID’), with up to 46% of patients reporting fatigue lasting weeks to months. The investigators of the international Collaborative on Fatigue Following Infection (COFFI) conducted a systematic review of post-COVID fatigue, a narrative review on fatigue after other infections and made recommendations for clinical and research approaches to assessment of fatigue following COVID-19.
In the majority of COVID-19 cohort studies, persistent fatigue was reported by a significant minority of patients, ranging from 13-33% at 16-20 weeks post symptom onset. Data from the prospective cohort studies in COFFI and others, indicate that fatigue is also a prevalent outcome from many acute systemic infections notably infectious mononucleosis, with a case rate for clinically-significant post-infective fatigue after exclusion of recognized medical and psychiatric causes, of 10-35% at 6 months.
To better characterize post-COVID fatigue, the COFFI investigators recommend: application of validated screening questionnaires for case detection, standardized interviews encompassing fatigue, mood, and other symptoms, and investigative approaches to identify end-organ damage and mental health conditions.
Infection with Giardia lamblia in a non-endemic area was associated with a high prevalence of IBS and chronic fatigue 3 years after acute illness, and the risk was significantly higher than in the control group. This shows that the potential consequences of giardiasis are more serious than previously known. Further studies are needed, especially in areas where giardiasis is endemic.
SummaryBackgroundIn 2013, a systematic review and Delphi consensus reported that specific probiotics can benefit adult patients with irritable bowel syndrome (IBS) and other gastrointestinal (GI) problems.AimTo update the consensus with new evidence.MethodsA systematic review identified randomised, placebo‐controlled trials published between January 2012 and June 2017. Evidence was graded, previously developed statements were reassessed by an 8‐expert panel, and agreement was reached via Delphi consensus.ResultsA total of 70 studies were included (IBS, 34; diarrhoea associated with antibiotics, 13; diarrhoea associated with Helicobacter pylori eradication therapy, 7; other conditions, 16). Of 15 studies that examined global IBS symptoms as a primary endpoint, 8 reported significant benefits of probiotics vs placebo. Consensus statements with 100% agreement and “high” evidence level indicated that specific probiotics help reduce overall symptom burden and abdominal pain in some patients with IBS and duration/intensity of diarrhoea in patients prescribed antibiotics or H. pylori eradication therapy, and have favourable safety. Statements with 70%‐100% agreement and “moderate” evidence indicated that, in some patients with IBS, specific probiotics help reduce bloating/distension and improve bowel movement frequency/consistency.ConclusionsThis updated review indicates that specific probiotics are beneficial in certain lower GI problems, although many of the new publications did not report benefits of probiotics, possibly due to inclusion of new, less efficacious preparations. Specific probiotics can relieve lower GI symptoms in IBS, prevent diarrhoea associated with antibiotics and H. pylori eradication therapy, and show favourable safety. This study will help clinicians recommend/prescribe probiotics for specific symptoms.
Giardia infection in a nonendemic setting is associated with an increased risk for irritable bowel syndrome and chronic fatigue 6 years later. These conditions should be considered a differential diagnosis in patients with persisting symptoms after eradication of the parasite.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.