2005
DOI: 10.1007/s10519-005-6119-2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Assortative Mating in Drosophila Adapted to a Microsite Ecological Gradient

Abstract: Elucidating the causes of population divergence, and ultimately speciation, is a central objective of evolutionary biology. A number of previous studies of Drosophila populations from the Nahal Oren canyon (Mt Carmel, Israel) revealed significant interslope differences for a complex of fitness and behavioral traits. Peculiarities in courtship song patterns and nonrandom mating were observed, despite a small interslope distance. Single and multiple mate choice tests with D. melanogaster from the opposite slopes… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
32
2

Year Published

2006
2006
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 27 publications
(34 citation statements)
references
References 63 publications
0
32
2
Order By: Relevance
“…The most exciting findings on EC flies come from sexual behavior experiments indicating that the EC population cannot be considered panmictic. These findings include positive assortative mating (22,43), interslope differences in mating propensity, sexual discrimination and reproductive behavior (39), and slope specificity in the courtship song pattern (K.I., unpublished data). Some discrepant and controversial data on nonrandom mating in EC flies were also obtained (see below) inspiring further investigations.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 98%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The most exciting findings on EC flies come from sexual behavior experiments indicating that the EC population cannot be considered panmictic. These findings include positive assortative mating (22,43), interslope differences in mating propensity, sexual discrimination and reproductive behavior (39), and slope specificity in the courtship song pattern (K.I., unpublished data). Some discrepant and controversial data on nonrandom mating in EC flies were also obtained (see below) inspiring further investigations.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Some peculiarities in the procedure that could affect the results should be noted. In our tests (22,39,43,45), flies were observed until Ϸ50-60% of the maximal number of couples were formed to avoid a nonchoice situation, unlike the protocol of T. Panhuis et al (44) where mating pairs were aspirated until a maximum of 50 pairs were collected (more than 78% of the maximal couples number), or 1 hr had passed from the beginning of test. Recent experiments for premating isolation in flies from EC, conducted in two laboratories (Simon Fraser University, Burnaby, Canada, and University of Haifa, Haifa, Israel), under a variety of protocols, detected significant assortative mating in three of six single choice tests in Burnaby, suggesting that the populations are behaviorally differentiated in some manner (45).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…If a colonizing species such as Z. tuberculatus succeeded to evolve significant interslope allozymic diversity in about 30 or more years, it could also evolve mate choice, which is directly dependent on habitat and resource choice, as was the case with D. melanogaster. In the latter, peculiarities in courtship song patterns and nonrandom mating (i.e., mate choice) were observed at EC, despite a very small interslope distance of 200 m (39,40). Single-and multiple-mate choice tests with Drosophila melanogaster from the opposite slopes displayed highly significant assortative mating, with a preference for slope-specific sexual partners, based on variation in courtship songs (40).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…A final possible explanation of the discrepancy in the results could be that differential selection initiates the creation of alternative gene complexes (haplotypes) for loci affecting the selected traits on the two slopes, and that their maintenance in the face of gene flow/ recombination is due to selection facilitated by certain habitat choice (Nevo et al, 1998) and assortative mating Iliadi et al, 2001;Singh et al, 2005). In this scenario, adaptive differentiation can withstand the disruptive effects of migration and recombination.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%