2008
DOI: 10.1080/10528008.2008.11489045
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Assurance of Learning and Outcomes Assessment: a Case Study of Assessment of a Marketing Curriculum

Abstract: Recent AACSB International accreditation standards have placed higher emphasis on programmatic outcomes assessment through the assurance oj learning criteria which require tighter alignment oj school, program and course goals. Although business and marketing literature has addressed various aspects oj the assurance oj learning process, there is no complete tested model currently in the literature that demonstrates how outcomes assessment should take place within the context oj an ongoing program review. In add… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
14
0
1

Year Published

2008
2008
2014
2014

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 28 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
0
14
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…While some scholars (e.g., Kelley, Tong, & Choi, 2010;Martell, 2007;Romero, 2008;Sampson & Betters-Reed, 2008;Treleaven & Voola, 2008) applaud the increased flexibility and potential of the new AoL approach, others (e.g., Kilpatrick, Lund Dean, & Kilpatrick, 2008;Scott & Ofori-Dankwa, 2006) feel that AACSB's reporting and measuring requirements still result in excessive rigidity, narrow focus, and inhibit schools' flexibility. Yet others (e.g., Francisco, Noland, & Sinclair, 2008;Lowrie & Willmott, 2009) criticize exactly the flexibility that some praise in AACSB's modified approach.…”
Section: Assurance Of Learning: Advantages and Concernsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…While some scholars (e.g., Kelley, Tong, & Choi, 2010;Martell, 2007;Romero, 2008;Sampson & Betters-Reed, 2008;Treleaven & Voola, 2008) applaud the increased flexibility and potential of the new AoL approach, others (e.g., Kilpatrick, Lund Dean, & Kilpatrick, 2008;Scott & Ofori-Dankwa, 2006) feel that AACSB's reporting and measuring requirements still result in excessive rigidity, narrow focus, and inhibit schools' flexibility. Yet others (e.g., Francisco, Noland, & Sinclair, 2008;Lowrie & Willmott, 2009) criticize exactly the flexibility that some praise in AACSB's modified approach.…”
Section: Assurance Of Learning: Advantages and Concernsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Indirect assessment was implemented through another range of instruments such as surveys, mostly taken from graduating students, alumni, and their employers; exit interviews with graduating students; and evaluations of supervisor findings in internships. Sampson and Betters-Reed (2008) took a different road in highlighting the advantages of AoL by focusing on the multiplicity of AACSB-approved measuring topics throughout the business curriculum. They list learning outcomes such as communication, ethics, analytical skills, use of information technology, multicultural understanding, organizational dynamics, local and global environments, and other management specifics.…”
Section: Perceived Advantages Of Aolmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…An effective plan requires: (1) broad-based involvement of faculty, students, and administrators; (2) multi-trait, multimethod assessment approaches (similar to a ''balanced scorecard''), which include both direct and indirect assessment measures; and (3) followup activities to inform key stakeholders and motivate continuous improvement. Sampson and Betters-Reed (2008) present a conceptual model that demonstrates how an ongoing AoL program can be put in the context of program review and continuous improvement. This approach, which is more strategic in nature and is directly tied to curriculum change, alters the perception of assessment work from short-term compliance to an embedded model of continuous curricular improvement.…”
Section: Assurance Of Learningmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To address concerns presented by relevant stakeholders such as students, employers, public officials, accreditors, and others; business schools are attempting to gain deeper understanding about assurance of learning (AoL) outcomes and how it applies to their programs (Attaway, Chandra, Dos Santos, Thatcher, & Wright, 2011, Mosca, Agacer, Flaming, & Buzza, 2011Sampson & Betters-Reed, 2008).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%