2008
DOI: 10.1016/j.jpba.2008.07.021
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Assuring specificity for a multivariate near-infrared (NIR) calibration: The example of the Chambersburg Shoot-out 2002 data set

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
40
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 40 publications
(40 citation statements)
references
References 4 publications
0
40
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Such analysis requires a simple yet sturdy model that is capable of maintaining its predictive capability over a prolonged period, coupled with instrumentation that is similarly robust in terms of operational lifetime. The capability of the calibration model to successfully predict unknown samples (i.e., samples not present in the calibration set used to construct the model) must also be assessed; this is done by applying the model to a small number of samples for which the models target property for prediction is defined [3,33,[50][51][52][53][54][55]. Once the model's results are comparable with those of the reference values, the model can be considered to be accurate and useful for determining that target property in the future analysis of unknown samples.…”
Section: Chemometricsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Such analysis requires a simple yet sturdy model that is capable of maintaining its predictive capability over a prolonged period, coupled with instrumentation that is similarly robust in terms of operational lifetime. The capability of the calibration model to successfully predict unknown samples (i.e., samples not present in the calibration set used to construct the model) must also be assessed; this is done by applying the model to a small number of samples for which the models target property for prediction is defined [3,33,[50][51][52][53][54][55]. Once the model's results are comparable with those of the reference values, the model can be considered to be accurate and useful for determining that target property in the future analysis of unknown samples.…”
Section: Chemometricsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…An assessment of the model's accuracy is essential to avoid overfitting; consequently, different validation procedures should be applied, as a calibration model without validation is nonsense. In feasibility studies, cross-validation is a practical method to demonstrate that the instrumental method can predict something; however, the predictive ability of the method needs to be demonstrated using an independent validation set [3,33,[50][51][52][53][54][55][56][57][58].…”
Section: Chemometricsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is generally agreed that the independent set of samples should be sourced from other experiments, batches or conditions (e.g. harvest, different temperatures, moisture content, origin) (Fearn 1997, Cozzolino et al 2009Norris and Ritchie 2008). A common strategy followed by many researches is to split the dataset into two subsets called calibration set (used to construct the model) and validation set (Murray and Cowe 2004;Cozzolino 2014).…”
Section: Model Interpretation and Validationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Both approaches, applying EMSC on raw data and applying EMSC on derivated data, are regularly employed. [13][14][15][16][17] It is important to demonstrate the effects and differences of these two approaches, since it is not readily apparent in scientific literature which is the right one to use.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…18 In the presented study, the particlar attention was given to the optimization of size of the moving window employed in the SG algorithm during the conversion of recorded spectra into derivative form. Moreover, since the SG and the EMSC preprocessing procedures are often used cooperatively, [14][15][16][17] the optimal sequence of the preprocessing procedures was assessed. The preprocessing methodologies were studied using a real data set and a simulated one where all constituent effects are known.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%