Search citation statements
Paper Sections
Citation Types
Year Published
Publication Types
Relationship
Authors
Journals
Background Reliable performance frameworks and indicators are essential for understanding the ability of public health systems to meet their mandates and to encourage ongoing learning and quality improvement. While such frameworks exist in health care, they are not well established in public health. Methods We conducted a scoping review of indexed and grey literature to identify quality frameworks for public health systems in Canada and comparable countries. The search included documents published in English from 2012 to May 2022 and focused on countries with similar national contexts and public health systems to Canada. Articles that focused solely on the health care system, editorials, opinions, books, correspondence, or commentaries, and those that were highly focused on a specific area of public health work that was not generalizable, were excluded. The included studies underwent thematic analysis to identify common themes. Results The indexed literature search yielded 420 citations, none of which met the inclusion criteria. The grey literature search identified 1500 documents, four of which originated from national-level public health organizations in England, Wales, and the United States. The identified quality frameworks varied in their goals, reflecting the role of the organization producing the document. However, several themes common to the majority of frameworks emerged, including a skilled workforce, strong leadership, effective and timely service, equity, quality improvement, close partnerships, adequate resourcing, and innovation. Conclusion Although the study did not identify a commonly used framework or approach, it highlights major themes that can guide the development of a suite of indicators supporting structural and process enablers and community impact to measure and report on the quality of public health systems. Notably, the study emphasizes the importance of non-peer-reviewed literature in this field and underscores the need for more transparent documentation of framework and indicator development processes. Developing reliable performance frameworks and indicators that promote ongoing learning and quality improvement is crucial for public health systems to fulfill their mandate of promoting and protecting health in the population.
Background Reliable performance frameworks and indicators are essential for understanding the ability of public health systems to meet their mandates and to encourage ongoing learning and quality improvement. While such frameworks exist in health care, they are not well established in public health. Methods We conducted a scoping review of indexed and grey literature to identify quality frameworks for public health systems in Canada and comparable countries. The search included documents published in English from 2012 to May 2022 and focused on countries with similar national contexts and public health systems to Canada. Articles that focused solely on the health care system, editorials, opinions, books, correspondence, or commentaries, and those that were highly focused on a specific area of public health work that was not generalizable, were excluded. The included studies underwent thematic analysis to identify common themes. Results The indexed literature search yielded 420 citations, none of which met the inclusion criteria. The grey literature search identified 1500 documents, four of which originated from national-level public health organizations in England, Wales, and the United States. The identified quality frameworks varied in their goals, reflecting the role of the organization producing the document. However, several themes common to the majority of frameworks emerged, including a skilled workforce, strong leadership, effective and timely service, equity, quality improvement, close partnerships, adequate resourcing, and innovation. Conclusion Although the study did not identify a commonly used framework or approach, it highlights major themes that can guide the development of a suite of indicators supporting structural and process enablers and community impact to measure and report on the quality of public health systems. Notably, the study emphasizes the importance of non-peer-reviewed literature in this field and underscores the need for more transparent documentation of framework and indicator development processes. Developing reliable performance frameworks and indicators that promote ongoing learning and quality improvement is crucial for public health systems to fulfill their mandate of promoting and protecting health in the population.
In this work, the authors analyze virtual reality rehabilitation research on strokes in the past 8 years (2015–2022) from the perspective of Information Technology governance (how these initiatives sustain and extend organization strategy), using the “Four Ares” technique that is widely used in other sectors with a proven track record. Are we doing the right things? Are we doing them the right way? Are we getting them done well? Are we getting the benefits? Methods: The bibliography was exhaustively selected for evaluation considering these four questions, covering different aspects of existing evidence on this topic. Results: Some evidence of positive outcomes in patients with a stroke was found, and different approaches, types of measurement, platforms, and methods were analyzed to discern the present situation of research and recommendations. Conclusions: Positive outcomes on motor functions and on motivation and patient adherence to the treatment suggests this is an interesting field to research and examine in the future. Homogeneity on research design and larger samples are key to improving evidence and identifying the best strategies to use.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
customersupport@researchsolutions.com
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
Copyright © 2025 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.