2013
DOI: 10.1002/ppul.22926
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Asthma‐predictive‐index, bronchial‐challenge, sputum eosinophils in acutely wheezing preschoolers

Abstract: Wheezing preschoolers presenting to the ED is a unique population with significantly higher rate of positive S-API and adenosine-BCT compared with controls and frequently (50%) express eosinophilic airway inflammation.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

1
17
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(18 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
1
17
0
Order By: Relevance
“…A prospective study demonstrated that preschoolers who visited the ED owing to wheezing showed no difference in AHR from healthy pre schoolers. 32) This study has some limitations. First, because this was a crosssectional study, it was impossible to confirm whether the children developed asthma later.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 91%
“…A prospective study demonstrated that preschoolers who visited the ED owing to wheezing showed no difference in AHR from healthy pre schoolers. 32) This study has some limitations. First, because this was a crosssectional study, it was impossible to confirm whether the children developed asthma later.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 91%
“…Ater et al have shown that wheezing preschoolers presenting to the emergency department, represent a unique population with a significantly higher rate of positive asthma predictive index and adenosine‐bronchial challenge tests compared to controls, and frequently express eosinophilic airway inflammation. They also showed that the MCH challenge was sensitive but much less specific than the adenosine challenge in these children . In our current study, we found that eight out of nine children who had severe respiratory exacerbations had severe BHR and we also showed the association between the severity of BHR to adenosine and the diagnosis of asthma 3 years later.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…14 Because the API has only been used in prospective or cross-sectional studies, [15][16][17][18][19] not a retrospective study, we recently validated use of the API for a retrospective study. The API and PAC showed a high concordance rate (82.9%), and the API showed excellent construct validity in association with known risk factors for asthma, such as other atopic conditions, a family history of asthma, and lower parental education, which indicates suitability of using the API for a retrospective study.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%