Protein-energy malnutrition is thought to be widespread in hospitalized patients. However, the specificity of indexes used to assess malnutrition is uncertain. We therefore assessed the rate of false-positive diagnoses of malnutrition when biochemical-anthropometric indexes were applied to healthy subjects. Nutritional status was assessed in 175 healthy blood donors (aged 44.2 +/- 13.4 y) and in 34 highly fit elderly volunteers (aged 74.7 +/- 3.6 y) participating in the Nijmegen Four Days Walking March. We investigated both the Nutritional Risk Index [(1.489 x albumin) + (41.7 x present/usual weight)] and the Maastricht Index [20.68-(0.24 x albumin, g/L)-(19.21 x serum transthyretin, g/L)-(1.86 x lymphocytes, 10(6)/L)-(0.04 x ideal weight)]. We found previously that 52-64% of nonsurgical hospitalized patients were malnourished according to these indexes. In the present study, 1.9% of the 209 volunteers had apparent malnutrition according to the Nutritional Risk Index and 3.8% according to the Maastricht Index. The prevalence of apparent malnutrition in the elderly volunteers was 5.9% and 20.6%, respectively. The rate of false-positive diagnoses was acceptably low in those aged < 70 y with both the Nutritional Risk Index and the Maastricht Index; therefore, the use of these indexes will not cause a clinically significant increase in the prevalence of malnutrition because patients who are not malnourished are included. The high percentage of spurious malnutrition in the elderly limits the use of the Maastricht Index to subjects aged < 70 y.
Using HS inhalations significantly shortens LOS and lowers AR in preschool children presenting with an acute wheezing episode to the emergency department.
Wheezing preschoolers presenting to the ED is a unique population with significantly higher rate of positive S-API and adenosine-BCT compared with controls and frequently (50%) express eosinophilic airway inflammation.
BackgroundCystic fibrosis (CF) patients are predisposed to infection and colonization with different microbes. Some cause deterioration of lung functions, while others are colonizers without clear pathogenic effects. Our aim was to understand the effects of Nocardia species in sputum cultures on the course of lung disease in CF patients.Material/MethodsA retrospective study analyzing the impact of positive Nocardia spp. in sputum of 19 CF patients over a period of 10 years, comparing them with similar status patients without Nocardia growth. Pulmonary function tests (PFTs) are used as indicators of lung disease severity and decline rate in functions per year is calculated.ResultsNo significant difference in PFTs of CF patients with positive Nocardia in sputum was found in different sub-groups according to number of episodes of growth, background variables, or treatment plans. The yearly decline in PFTs was similar to that recognized in CF patients. The control group patients showed similar background data. However, a small difference was found in the rate of decline of their PFTs, which implies a possibly slower rate of progression of lung disease.ConclusionsThe prognosis of lung disease in CF patients colonized with Nocardia does not seem to differ based on the persistence of growth on cultures, different treatment plans or risk factors. Apparently, Nocardia does not cause a deterioration of lung functions with time. However, it may show a trend to faster decline in PFTs compared to similar status CF patients without isolation of this microorganism in their sputum.
Hyperacute vasospasm is likely common in patients with intraoperative aneurysm rupture and may be an unrecognized element of the natural history of aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage. In this limited series, there was an association between hyperacute vasospasm and delayed cerebral infarction.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.