Purpose
To compare oral reading fluency (ORF) in students with no/low astigmatism and moderate/high astigmatism and to assess the impact of spectacle correction on ORF in moderate and high astigmats.
Methods
Subjects were 3rd–8th grade students from a highly astigmatic population. Refractive error was determined through subjectively refined cycloplegic autorefraction. Data from students with ocular abnormalities, anisometropia, symptomatic binocular vision disorders, or refractive error that did not meet study criteria (no/low (cyl < 1.00 both eyes, no significant myopia/hyperopia), moderate (cyl ≥ 1.00 D both eyes, mean ≥ 1.00 D and < 3.00 D), or high astigmatism group (cyl ≥ 1.00 D both eyes, mean ≥ 3.00 D)) were excluded. ORF was tested with a modified version of the DIBELS Next test of ORF. No/low astigmats were tested without spectacles; astigmats were tested with and without spectacles. Mean ORF was compared in no/low astigmats and astigmats (with and without correction). Improvement in ORF with spectacles was compared for moderate and high astigmats.
Results
The sample included 130 no/low, 67 moderate, and 76 high astigmats. ORF was lower in uncorrected astigmats than in no/low astigmats (p=0.011). ORF did not significantly differ in no/low astigmats and corrected astigmats (p=0.10). ORF significantly improved with spectacle correction in high astigmats (p=0.001, mean improvement 6.55 words per minute (WPM)), but not in moderate astigmats (p=0.193, mean improvement 1.87 WPM). Effects of spectacle wear were observed in students who read smaller text stimuli (older grades).
Conclusions
ORF is significantly reduced in students with bilateral astigmatism (≥ 1.00D) when uncorrected, but not when best-corrected, compared to their non-astigmatic peers. Improvement in ORF with spectacle correction is seen in high astigmats, but not in moderate astigmats. These data support the recommendation for full-time spectacle wear in astigmatic students, particularly those with high astigmatism.