Purpose To compare visual performance between emmetropic and uncorrected moderately hyperopic preschool age children without strabismus or amblyopia. Design Cross-sectional study. Methods Setting Multicenter, institutional. Patient or Study Population Children aged 4 or 5 years. Intervention or Observation Procedures Visual functions were classified as normal or reduced for each child based on the 95% confidence interval for emmetropes. Hyperopic (≥3.0 diopters [D] to ≤6.0D in the most hyperopic meridian; astigmatism≤1.50D; anisometropia≤1.0D) and emmetropic status were determined by cycloplegic autorefraction. Main Outcome Measures Uncorrected monocular distance and binocular near visual acuity (VA); accommodative response; and near random dot stereoacuity. Results Mean (±SD) LogMAR distance VA among 248 emmetropes was better than among 244 hyperopes for the better (0.05±0.10 vs. 0.14±0.11, p<.001) and worse eyes (0.10±0.11 vs. 0.19±0.10, p<.001). Mean binocular LogMAR near VA was better in emmetropes than hyperopes (0.13±0.11 vs. 0.21±0.11, p<.001). Mean accommodative response for emmetropes was lower than for hyperopes for both Monocular Estimation Method (1.03±0.51D vs. 2.03±1.03D, p<0.001) and Grand Seiko (0.46±0.45D vs. 0.99±1.0D, p<0.001). Median near stereoacuity was better in emmetropes than hyperopes (40 sec arc vs.120 sec arc, p<0.001). The average number of reduced visual functions was lower in emmetropic than in hyperopic children (.19 vs.1.0 p<0.001). Conclusions VA, accommodative response, and stereoacuity were significantly reduced in moderate uncorrected hyperopic preschool children compared to emmetropes. Higher hyperopes (≥4 to ≤6D) were at greatest risk, although more than half of children with lower magnitudes (≥3 to <4D) demonstrated one or more reductions in function.

Although the DEM is widely used in optometric practice, the results of this study suggest that clinicians should be cautious about using the DEM test in isolation for reaching a diagnosis or monitoring the effectiveness of treatment for saccadic dysfunction.

The presence of astigmatism detected in a screening setting was associated with a pattern of reduced academic readiness in multiple developmental and educational domains among at-risk preschool-aged children. This study may help to establish the role of early vision screenings, comprehensive vision examinations, and the need for refractive correction to improve academic success in preschool children.