2017
DOI: 10.1038/nature24638
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Astrocytic neuroligins control astrocyte morphogenesis and synaptogenesis

Abstract: Astrocytes are highly complex glial cells with numerous fine cellular processes which infiltrate the neuropil to interact with synapses. The mechanisms controlling the establishment of astrocytes’ remarkable morphology and how impairing astrocytic infiltration of the neuropil alters synaptic connectivity are largely unknown. Here we find that cortical astrocyte morphogenesis depends on direct contact with neuronal processes and occurs in tune with the growth and activity of synaptic circuits. Neuroligin (NL) f… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

16
413
2

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 399 publications
(459 citation statements)
references
References 41 publications
16
413
2
Order By: Relevance
“…The time window of astrocyte maturation overlaps with the period of synapse formation. Astrocytes secrete important protein signals that induce synapse formation (Allen et al, ; Blanco‐Suarez, Liu, Kopelevich, & Allen, ; Christopherson et al, ; Eroglu et al, ; Farhy‐Tselnicker et al, ; Kucukdereli et al, ; Pfrieger & Barres, ; Stogsdill et al, ; Ullian et al, ). To test whether HBEGF, EGFR, and P53 affect astrocytic interaction with synapses, we examined the expression of genes synapse‐inducing proteins.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The time window of astrocyte maturation overlaps with the period of synapse formation. Astrocytes secrete important protein signals that induce synapse formation (Allen et al, ; Blanco‐Suarez, Liu, Kopelevich, & Allen, ; Christopherson et al, ; Eroglu et al, ; Farhy‐Tselnicker et al, ; Kucukdereli et al, ; Pfrieger & Barres, ; Stogsdill et al, ; Ullian et al, ). To test whether HBEGF, EGFR, and P53 affect astrocytic interaction with synapses, we examined the expression of genes synapse‐inducing proteins.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These functions were recently reviewed [51], and include regulation of synaptic formation, control of connectivity of synapses, integration and synchronization of neuronal networks and the maintenance of BBB integrity [52][53][54][55][56][57][58][59][60][61][62][63][64][65][66][67][68][69][70]. These functions were recently reviewed [51], and include regulation of synaptic formation, control of connectivity of synapses, integration and synchronization of neuronal networks and the maintenance of BBB integrity [52][53][54][55][56][57][58][59][60][61][62][63][64][65][66][67][68][69][70].…”
Section: Adrenergic Astroglial Excitation and Neurodegenerationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…cellular heterogeneity alter function of these cells in a physiologic setting, and how might mutations in diseaserisk genes further alter cellular function leading to AD pathology? Equally, how do mutations in these genes alter normal astrocyte functions, such as the provision of neuronal support (34), synaptogenesis (35)(36)(37)(38)(39), synapse pruning (40,41), among others, which may account for altered neuronal function and consequent cognitive decline associated with AD? Answers to these questions will provide new insights into AD, and experiments to fully understand this are already underway in multiple laboratories around the world.…”
Section: Genome-wide Association Studiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These barriers can become increasingly permeable to larger serum proteins following trauma, and in some diseases (57)(58)(59) [for review, see also (60,61)], the use of serum in CNS cell cultures changes their baseline morphology and transcriptome (16,42,(62)(63)(64). These cultures have been incredibly valuable for investigations of glial cell function (35)(36)(37)(38)52); however, with already highly expressed, disease-reactive transcripts in "baseline" cultures (15,16,18), it is likely that many false-negative results are achieved, as the baseline expression of many known reactive transcripts is so high (Fig. 2) that the d in expression changes following hypothesized "disease state-inducing molecules" may be too low to distinguish.…”
Section: New Models For An Old Diseasementioning
confidence: 99%