2023
DOI: 10.1088/1674-1056/acad6e
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Asymmetric magnetoimpedance effect and dipolar interactions of FINEMET/SiO2/FePd composite ribbons

Abstract: The dipolar interactions were investigated through the asymmetric magnetoimpedance in FINEMET/SiO2/FePd composite ribbons. The interface between the hard (FePd layer) and soft (FINEMET ribbon) phases was coherent by SiO2 layer in FINEMET/SiO2/FePd composite ribbons, which effectively induced dipolar interactions. The contribution of dipolar interactions to the bias field (H b ) by asymmetrical giant magnetoimpedance and magnetic properties was analyzed.… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2024
2024
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(1 citation statement)
references
References 28 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The magnetic exchange interaction and surface stress between layers due to a lattice match between the FeCo layer and FINEMET ribbon was perceived as the main reason behind the enhancement of the MI effect. In addition, the MI ratios in FePd/FINEMET/FePd, FINEMET/SiO 2 /FePd, and FINEMET/IGZO/CoFeSiB sandwiched structures (Width FINEMET = 0.6 mm) have been systematically investigated [30,31]. The dipole interaction and magnetic interaction mechanisms have been adopted to explain the results [32].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The magnetic exchange interaction and surface stress between layers due to a lattice match between the FeCo layer and FINEMET ribbon was perceived as the main reason behind the enhancement of the MI effect. In addition, the MI ratios in FePd/FINEMET/FePd, FINEMET/SiO 2 /FePd, and FINEMET/IGZO/CoFeSiB sandwiched structures (Width FINEMET = 0.6 mm) have been systematically investigated [30,31]. The dipole interaction and magnetic interaction mechanisms have been adopted to explain the results [32].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%