2005
DOI: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2005.06.001
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Asymmetric modulation of human visual cortex activity during 10° lateral gaze (fMRI study)

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

7
11
0

Year Published

2005
2005
2014
2014

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 27 publications
(18 citation statements)
references
References 58 publications
7
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The shift of the beating field leads to an asymmetric activation of the visual cortex in both hemispheres, with a stronger activation in the hemisphere contralateral to the "longer"-lasting pursuit phase. This is in agreement with a recent activation study on 10°lateral gaze compared to fixation straight ahead [Deutschländer et al, 2005]. During lateral fixation, activations occurred in the cuneus, lingual, and fusiform gyrus of the hemisphere contralateral to the fixation target.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 92%
“…The shift of the beating field leads to an asymmetric activation of the visual cortex in both hemispheres, with a stronger activation in the hemisphere contralateral to the "longer"-lasting pursuit phase. This is in agreement with a recent activation study on 10°lateral gaze compared to fixation straight ahead [Deutschländer et al, 2005]. During lateral fixation, activations occurred in the cuneus, lingual, and fusiform gyrus of the hemisphere contralateral to the fixation target.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 92%
“…This S2 response was localized to the cuneus, precuneus, and middle temporal gyrus. Due to the role of these regions in mapping eye position and integrating such information with target spatial locations (Deutschlander et al, 2005;Makino, Yokosawa, Takeda, & Kumada, 2004;Vidnyanszky, Gulyas, & Roland, 2000), this neural response difference may reflect differences in comparison of the current eye position with an endogenously generated goal location. However, if the S2 response reflects processing of the current spatial location with either the endogenously versus exogenously generated target location, it is not clear why the S2 responses for the prosaccades (exogenous goal location) and erroneous prosaccades (exogenous and endogenous goal locations) do not differ.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Furthermore, the fusional vergence in response to a retinal disparity and the accommodative vergence affects the fixation when there is a loss of focus [2]. Previously, fixation stability has been studied during reading [19][20][21], when studying intruding saccades and nystagmus [8,22,23], and in studies using magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) [24] and position emission tomography (PET) [25].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%