2016
DOI: 10.1016/j.oceaneng.2015.12.001
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Asymmetric roll center of symmetric body in beam waves

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
1
1

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 1 publication
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…As a result, The water depth could be controlled and in the present experiments was set to 0.5 m. Uniform main flow was produced by four centrifugal water pumps. The maximum achievable current velocity in the channel was 0.5 m/s [32]. Its correspondent Hydraulic Froude number (Frh ¼ V= ffiffiffiffiffiffi ffi gH p ) was 0.22.…”
Section: Model Setupmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As a result, The water depth could be controlled and in the present experiments was set to 0.5 m. Uniform main flow was produced by four centrifugal water pumps. The maximum achievable current velocity in the channel was 0.5 m/s [32]. Its correspondent Hydraulic Froude number (Frh ¼ V= ffiffiffiffiffiffi ffi gH p ) was 0.22.…”
Section: Model Setupmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The authors obtained the ICR by intersecting the perpendiculars to the velocity vectors measured at two distinct points in the floating body: this approach is, in fact, well established in the general kinematics theory [13], and will form the basis for the current investigation, as explained in Section 2. Fernandes et al [14] built on that study by performing experiments in regular waves close to the roll natural period, supported by additional numerical calculations in the frequency domain. The authors showed that the ICR locus of an FPSO vessel is a straight line not coinciding with the line of symmetry of the vessel, dependent on the frequency of the waves.…”
Section: Previous Workmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…Identification of such point is crucial as it can improve the understanding of the dynamic behaviour of FOWT, which, in turn, can lead to better motion reduction methods and may be leveraged to improve the design of these highly dynamic systems. 1 Since the CR does not necessarily coincide with the centroid of the waterplane area [14] (except for the special case of very small rotations with no dynamic forces acting on the freely floating body), the side of the floater facing the incoming waves experiences different 1 Note that identification of ICR is not strictly required to compute the responses with fully-coupled aero-hydro-servo-elastic nonlinear time domain dynamic solvers, in which case the physics of the problem (distributed loads) drive the ICR, and not vice versa. The knowledge of ICR is useful for lowerfidelity numerical models that make assumptions about the centre of rotation (CR), as well as to understand the FOWT coupled motion patterns.…”
Section: Motivationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this method a fixed center of rotation must be assumed. Assuming it even exists, determining an approximate center of rotation is a difficult task (see for instance [3]). Since the vessel is free to roll and sway, center of rotation is a less problematic issue in free decay tests.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%