2019
DOI: 10.1002/rsa.20842
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Asymmetry and structural information in preferential attachment graphs

Abstract: Graph symmetries intervene in diverse applications, from enumeration, to graph structure compression, to the discovery of graph dynamics (e.g., node arrival order inference). Whereas Erdős-Rényi graphs are typically asymmetric, real networks are highly symmetric. So a natural question is whether preferential attachment graphs, where in each step a new node with m edges is added, exhibit any symmetry. In recent work it was proved that preferential attachment graphs are symmetric for m = 1, and there is some non… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
40
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
3
2
1

Relationship

3
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 23 publications
(40 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
0
40
0
Order By: Relevance
“…(iii) If the indices of the vertices are not known and only the undirected version of the graph is given, it may be possible to estimate the indices if m is sufficiently large. Such problem has been explored recently for the classical Barabási-Albert model [17], but we don't pursue it here for the variation with a planted community.…”
Section: Community Recovery Based On Childrenmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…(iii) If the indices of the vertices are not known and only the undirected version of the graph is given, it may be possible to estimate the indices if m is sufficiently large. Such problem has been explored recently for the classical Barabási-Albert model [17], but we don't pursue it here for the variation with a planted community.…”
Section: Community Recovery Based On Childrenmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For the real-world PPI networks it turns out that the number of symmetries is considerably high, which is in stark contradiction with properties of many random graph models. For example, it is known that graphs generated from Erdős-Renyi model [9] and from preferential attachment model [10] are asymmetric with high probability. Therefore they cannot be reasonably justified as underlying generation schemes for PPI networks.…”
Section: Motivation and Contributionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The number of automorphisms in the DD-model behaves differently as compared to many other graph models including preferential attachment and Erdos-Rényi models. The preferential-attachment graphs are asymmetric (no nontrivial symmetries) with high probability when the number of edges a new node brings into the graph exceeds 2 [10], and almost every graph from the Erdos-Rényi model is asymmetric [9]. On the other hand, the DD-model exhibits a large number of symmetries and it grows with the number of nodes, as shown in Figure 1.…”
Section: Selection Of Seed Graph G N0mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Thus, the vast majority of information of the labeled graphs in this model is present in the labeling itself, not in the underlying graph structure. In contrast, the entropy of the labeled and generated by, e.g., the preferential attachment model is Θ(n log n) [17].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The authors of [5] presented a compression algorithm that provably achieves asymptotically the first two terms of the structural entropy. In Łuczak et al [17] the authors precisely analyzed the labeled and structural entropies and gave asymptotically optimal compression algorithms for preferential attachment graphs. There has been recent work on universal compression schemes, including in a distributed scenario, by Delgosha and Anantharam [8,9].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%