2015
DOI: 10.1128/jvi.00661-15
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Asymptomatic Middle East Respiratory Syndrome Coronavirus Infection in Rabbits

Abstract: bThe ability of Middle East respiratory syndrome coronavirus (MERS-CoV) to infect small animal species may be restricted given the fact that mice, ferrets, and hamsters were shown to resist MERS-CoV infection. We inoculated rabbits with MERS-CoV. Although virus was detected in the lungs, neither significant histopathological changes nor clinical symptoms were observed. Infectious virus, however, was excreted from the upper respiratory tract, indicating a potential route of MERS-CoV transmission in some animal … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

6
88
1
1

Year Published

2016
2016
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 75 publications
(96 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
6
88
1
1
Order By: Relevance
“…However, the virus does not infect most small experimental animals such as mice, ferrets, rats, and hamsters, mainly because of the different DPP4 in these animals therefore posing a challenge for developing a vaccine by delaying scientific investigation on the virus infection, pathogenicity, and transmission. A rabbit model was reported to support MERS‐CoV, but more small animal models were required to accelerate MERS‐CoV research; therefore, susceptible mouse models were developed by different methods. The first model was developed by transducing mice with adenoviral vector encoding human DPP4 (AdV‐hDPP4) delivered intranasally to enable mouse cells in the respiratory tract to express hDPP4, allowing viral entry and infection .…”
Section: Animal Models For Vaccine Evaluationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, the virus does not infect most small experimental animals such as mice, ferrets, rats, and hamsters, mainly because of the different DPP4 in these animals therefore posing a challenge for developing a vaccine by delaying scientific investigation on the virus infection, pathogenicity, and transmission. A rabbit model was reported to support MERS‐CoV, but more small animal models were required to accelerate MERS‐CoV research; therefore, susceptible mouse models were developed by different methods. The first model was developed by transducing mice with adenoviral vector encoding human DPP4 (AdV‐hDPP4) delivered intranasally to enable mouse cells in the respiratory tract to express hDPP4, allowing viral entry and infection .…”
Section: Animal Models For Vaccine Evaluationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…30 Clinical signs and gross lesions were not observed in rabbits inoculated through intratracheal and intranasal routes. Microscopically, lesions were detected in the upper and lower respiratory tract at 3 and 4 days postinoculation (dpi).…”
Section: Rabbitsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…1, 2), 30 Stanley Perlman, David Meyerholz, and Jincun Zhao (Figs. 3-6), 80 Chien-Te Tseng and Xinrong Tao (Figs.…”
Section: Acknowledgementsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It can be argued that neither the rabbit nor the mouse model have a high predictive value for potential MERS therapies in humans. Rabbits remain asymptomatic upon inoculation with MERS-CoV and infection appears to be more prominent in the upper respiratory tract, which suggests that disease progression in rabbits differs considerably from that observed in patients who will require antiviral therapy most (Haagmans et al, 2015). The mouse as a model is valuable as an initial validation method of a therapy, but the predictive value of mouse models for therapeutic applications in humans is relatively limited as opposed to non-human primate models (Seok et al, 2013).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%