2012
DOI: 10.1142/9789814436434_0004
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Asymptotic and non asymptotic approximations for option valuation

Abstract: We give a broad overview of approximation methods to derive analytical formulas for accurate and quick evaluation of option prices. We compare different approaches, from the theoretical point of view regarding the tools they require, and also from the numerical point of view regarding their performances. In the case of local volatility models with general time-dependency, we derive new formulas using the local volatility function at the mid-point between strike and spot: in general, our approximations outperfo… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

6
24
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 20 publications
(30 citation statements)
references
References 37 publications
6
24
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The slope of ATM implied volatility depends on both the correlation and the slope of local volatility, which are therefore interpreted as skew parameters. There might be a competition between σ0false(1false) and ρ in the calibration procedures. (ii)For pure local volatility models (i.e., ξtrueprefixsup=0), we retrieve the results of theorem 22 in Bompis and Gobet (). (iii)For pure Heston models (i.e., scriptM1false(σfalse)=0), we recover the expansion given in theorem 2.5 of Forde and Jacquier (). In the case of zero correlation, the approximation formula becomes, for short maturity truerightσI(x0,T,k)lefttrueσ¯C3,Ts16trueσ¯TC3,Ts4σ¯3T2+C3,Ts4σ¯5T3m2trueσ¯ξ02σ0T24v0[]σ02v0T4+1+ξ0224σ0v032m2.We have obtained that an uncorrelated Heston model induces symmetric smile with respecct to the moneyness.…”
Section: Expansion Formulas For the Implied Volatilitymentioning
confidence: 83%
“…The slope of ATM implied volatility depends on both the correlation and the slope of local volatility, which are therefore interpreted as skew parameters. There might be a competition between σ0false(1false) and ρ in the calibration procedures. (ii)For pure local volatility models (i.e., ξtrueprefixsup=0), we retrieve the results of theorem 22 in Bompis and Gobet (). (iii)For pure Heston models (i.e., scriptM1false(σfalse)=0), we recover the expansion given in theorem 2.5 of Forde and Jacquier (). In the case of zero correlation, the approximation formula becomes, for short maturity truerightσI(x0,T,k)lefttrueσ¯C3,Ts16trueσ¯TC3,Ts4σ¯3T2+C3,Ts4σ¯5T3m2trueσ¯ξ02σ0T24v0[]σ02v0T4+1+ξ0224σ0v032m2.We have obtained that an uncorrelated Heston model induces symmetric smile with respecct to the moneyness.…”
Section: Expansion Formulas For the Implied Volatilitymentioning
confidence: 83%
“…If one additionally chooses false(truex¯,truey¯false)=false(x,yfalse), then the implied volatility approximation given in Lorig et al. () is equivalent to the implied volatility expansion given in Bompis and Gobet (). However, the expansion presented here and in Lorig et al.…”
Section: Implied Volatilitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…which is the approximation of the vanilla third order implied volatility expansion given in [5,Theorem 22]. The additional term π k F (a; x ′ avg ) T +ti ti due to the forward start is therefore interpreted as a forward bias.…”
Section: Third Order Forward Implied Volatility Expansionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To achieve this, we start from the vanilla implied volatility approximation provided in [5,Theorem 22] and then we use a conditioning expectation argument to express the price (1) of the forward start option as an expectation of the Black-Scholes price function with a stochastic volatility argument involving the local volatility function frozen at X ti , plus an error. Then we perform a volatility expansion to consider the local volatility function frozen at the log-spot x 0 .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%