2018
DOI: 10.1088/1742-6596/1096/1/012058
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Asymptotic methods and their applications in nonlinear fracture mechanics: a review

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 43 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The fracture parameter, known as the J ‐integral, was determined from both εnormaleML$\varepsilon _{\rm{e}}^{{\rm{ML}}}$ (Figure 5c) and εnormaleDIC$\varepsilon _{\rm{e}}^{{\rm{DIC}}}$ (Figure 5d) using the HRR near‐tip singularity solution. [ 32–35 ] The HRR near‐tip singularity solution can determine the J ‐integral from the effective strain field or from the separate strain field components, whereas the line integral method would require strain components as well as the effective strain. Because the ML field can only be mapped to an effective strain field, the HRR near‐tip singularity solution is a more suitable method to determine the J ‐integral from the ML field.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The fracture parameter, known as the J ‐integral, was determined from both εnormaleML$\varepsilon _{\rm{e}}^{{\rm{ML}}}$ (Figure 5c) and εnormaleDIC$\varepsilon _{\rm{e}}^{{\rm{DIC}}}$ (Figure 5d) using the HRR near‐tip singularity solution. [ 32–35 ] The HRR near‐tip singularity solution can determine the J ‐integral from the effective strain field or from the separate strain field components, whereas the line integral method would require strain components as well as the effective strain. Because the ML field can only be mapped to an effective strain field, the HRR near‐tip singularity solution is a more suitable method to determine the J ‐integral from the ML field.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%