Abstract:Abstract-The algebraic constant modulus algorithm (ACMA) is a noniterative blind source separation algorithm. It computes jointly beamforming vectors for all constant modulus sources as the solution of a joint diagonalization problem. In this paper, we analyze its asymptotic properties and show that (unlike CMA) it converges to the Wiener beamformer when the number of samples or the signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) goes to infinity. We also sketch its connection to the related JADE algorithm and derive a version of… Show more
“…The study of in Appendix II comes to the conclusion that the Gaussian assumption is optimal at high SNR unless some eigenvalues of the kurtosis matrix are equal to 1. This condition is closely related to the constant modulus property of the nuisance parameters [13]. To validate this result, let us obtain the asymptotic expression of (10) as the noise variance goes to zero .…”
Section: Best Quadratic Unbiased Estimatormentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The kurtosis matrix is null in the Gaussian case and provides the complete non-Gaussian information on the nuisance parameters that second-order NDA estimators are able to exploit [8]. In case of circular complex nuisance parameters, is given by the following diagonal matrix: (6) where is the fourth-order moment of the nuisance parameters [8], [13]. It can be shown that for PSK constellations [13], for QAM and APSK constellations and in the Gaussian case.…”
“…In case of circular complex nuisance parameters, is given by the following diagonal matrix: (6) where is the fourth-order moment of the nuisance parameters [8], [13]. It can be shown that for PSK constellations [13], for QAM and APSK constellations and in the Gaussian case. If the nuisance parameters are noncircular, e.g., in case of binary-phase-shift keying (BPSK) or CPM modulations, the exact can be obtained numerically.…”
“…Regarding the CM property, the constant modulus algorithm (CMA) was introduced by Treichler et al [11] in the area of adaptive equalization, and it has been widely studied in the last decade (see [12], [13], and references therein). The CMA has been later applied to blind parametric estimation problems in which the mixing matrix is structured (parameterized), and the aim is to determine the value of these parameters [14].…”
Section: A Contributions and Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In particular, we have that (4) where is the covariance matrix of the innovation vector when the nuisance parameters are not Gaussian distributed. The closed-form expression of was derived in [8], [13], obtaining that (5) where and matrix contains all the fourth-order cumulants (kurtosis) of the vector of nuisance parameters [8]. The kurtosis matrix is null in the Gaussian case and provides the complete non-Gaussian information on the nuisance parameters that second-order NDA estimators are able to exploit [8].…”
Abstract-This paper deals with the goodness of the Gaussian assumption when designing second-order blind estimation methods in the context of digital communications. The low-and high-signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) asymptotic performance of the maximum likelihood estimator-derived assuming Gaussian transmitted symbols-is compared with the performance of the optimal second-order estimator, which exploits the actual distribution of the discrete constellation. The asymptotic study concludes that the Gaussian assumption leads to the optimal second-order solution if the SNR is very low or if the symbols belong to a multilevel constellation such as quadrature-amplitude modulation (QAM) or amplitude-phase-shift keying (APSK). On the other hand, the Gaussian assumption can yield important losses at high SNR if the transmitted symbols are drawn from a constant modulus constellation such as phase-shift keying (PSK) or continuous-phase modulations (CPM). These conclusions are illustrated for the problem of direction-of-arrival (DOA) estimation of multiple digitally-modulated signals.
“…The study of in Appendix II comes to the conclusion that the Gaussian assumption is optimal at high SNR unless some eigenvalues of the kurtosis matrix are equal to 1. This condition is closely related to the constant modulus property of the nuisance parameters [13]. To validate this result, let us obtain the asymptotic expression of (10) as the noise variance goes to zero .…”
Section: Best Quadratic Unbiased Estimatormentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The kurtosis matrix is null in the Gaussian case and provides the complete non-Gaussian information on the nuisance parameters that second-order NDA estimators are able to exploit [8]. In case of circular complex nuisance parameters, is given by the following diagonal matrix: (6) where is the fourth-order moment of the nuisance parameters [8], [13]. It can be shown that for PSK constellations [13], for QAM and APSK constellations and in the Gaussian case.…”
“…In case of circular complex nuisance parameters, is given by the following diagonal matrix: (6) where is the fourth-order moment of the nuisance parameters [8], [13]. It can be shown that for PSK constellations [13], for QAM and APSK constellations and in the Gaussian case. If the nuisance parameters are noncircular, e.g., in case of binary-phase-shift keying (BPSK) or CPM modulations, the exact can be obtained numerically.…”
“…Regarding the CM property, the constant modulus algorithm (CMA) was introduced by Treichler et al [11] in the area of adaptive equalization, and it has been widely studied in the last decade (see [12], [13], and references therein). The CMA has been later applied to blind parametric estimation problems in which the mixing matrix is structured (parameterized), and the aim is to determine the value of these parameters [14].…”
Section: A Contributions and Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In particular, we have that (4) where is the covariance matrix of the innovation vector when the nuisance parameters are not Gaussian distributed. The closed-form expression of was derived in [8], [13], obtaining that (5) where and matrix contains all the fourth-order cumulants (kurtosis) of the vector of nuisance parameters [8]. The kurtosis matrix is null in the Gaussian case and provides the complete non-Gaussian information on the nuisance parameters that second-order NDA estimators are able to exploit [8].…”
Abstract-This paper deals with the goodness of the Gaussian assumption when designing second-order blind estimation methods in the context of digital communications. The low-and high-signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) asymptotic performance of the maximum likelihood estimator-derived assuming Gaussian transmitted symbols-is compared with the performance of the optimal second-order estimator, which exploits the actual distribution of the discrete constellation. The asymptotic study concludes that the Gaussian assumption leads to the optimal second-order solution if the SNR is very low or if the symbols belong to a multilevel constellation such as quadrature-amplitude modulation (QAM) or amplitude-phase-shift keying (APSK). On the other hand, the Gaussian assumption can yield important losses at high SNR if the transmitted symbols are drawn from a constant modulus constellation such as phase-shift keying (PSK) or continuous-phase modulations (CPM). These conclusions are illustrated for the problem of direction-of-arrival (DOA) estimation of multiple digitally-modulated signals.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.