2011
DOI: 10.1134/s001226611105003x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Asymptotic representations of solutions of nonautonomous ordinary differential equations with regularly varying nonlinearities

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
11
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 6 publications
1
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…As an application, they examined Equations and . Results of a similar character can be found in by Evtukhov and Samoilenko, who considered the equation x(n)=±p(t)F(x), where F is a regularly varying function of index different from 1 and p is a continuous function. They made a classification of positive solutions of whose behavior is related to regularly varying and rapidly varying functions.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 67%
“…As an application, they examined Equations and . Results of a similar character can be found in by Evtukhov and Samoilenko, who considered the equation x(n)=±p(t)F(x), where F is a regularly varying function of index different from 1 and p is a continuous function. They made a classification of positive solutions of whose behavior is related to regularly varying and rapidly varying functions.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 67%
“…Further, the theory of regular variation was applied to the study of odd-order equations of the form (21) with σ = 1 in [14], and of nth-order equations of the form y (n) + σ p(t)F (y) = 0 with a regularly varying (at 0 or ∞) nonlinearity F of an index different from one in [15]; see also comments on the paper [15] presented in [14], which clarify the setting and describe a comparison with the results in a ''standard'' form.…”
Section: Relations Of System (1) To Other Objects: Applications Compmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Lemmas 1-4 were proved in [10]. Lemma 5 follows directly from Lemmas 1-4 and the relation for determination of the kth derivative .k 2/ in the form of the fraction of two functions (see [11, p. 49], Chap.…”
Section: Formulation Of Main Theorems and Some Auxiliary Statementsmentioning
confidence: 99%