2022
DOI: 10.1007/s10463-021-00814-2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Asymptotics for function derivatives estimators based on stationary and ergodic discrete time processes

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

2
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 64 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…We shall also use the same symbol τ to denote the induced set transformation, which takes, for example, sets B ∈ B m into sets τB ∈ B m+1 ; for instance, see [52]. The naming of strong mixing in the above definition is more stringent than what is ordinarily referred to (when using the vocabulary of measure preserving dynamical systems) as strong mixing, namely to that lim n→∞ P(A ∩ τ −n B) = P(A)P(B) for any two measurable sets A, B; see, for instance [52,53] and more recent references [54][55][56][57][58][59][60]. Hence, strong mixing implies ergodicity, whereas the inverse is not always true (see, e.g., Remark 2.6 in page 50 in connection with Proposition 2.8 in page 51 in [40]).…”
Section: Lleccdf: Numerical Approximation Of Ccdf-modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We shall also use the same symbol τ to denote the induced set transformation, which takes, for example, sets B ∈ B m into sets τB ∈ B m+1 ; for instance, see [52]. The naming of strong mixing in the above definition is more stringent than what is ordinarily referred to (when using the vocabulary of measure preserving dynamical systems) as strong mixing, namely to that lim n→∞ P(A ∩ τ −n B) = P(A)P(B) for any two measurable sets A, B; see, for instance [52,53] and more recent references [54][55][56][57][58][59][60]. Hence, strong mixing implies ergodicity, whereas the inverse is not always true (see, e.g., Remark 2.6 in page 50 in connection with Proposition 2.8 in page 51 in [40]).…”
Section: Lleccdf: Numerical Approximation Of Ccdf-modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The lack of research on the general dependence framework for wavelet analysis prompted us to conduct the present study. Several arguments for contemplating an ergodic dependency structure in that data as opposed to a mixing structure are presented in [35][36][37][38][39][40][41][42], where further information on the notion of the ergodic property of processes and examples of such processes are provided. In [43], one of the arguments used to justify the ergodic setting is that establishing ergodic characteristics rather than the mixing condition can be significantly simpler for some classes of processes.…”
Section: Introduction and Motivationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As a result, strong mixing implies ergodicity, whereas the converse is not always true (see, for example, Remark 2.6 on page 50 concerning Proposition 2.8 on page 51 in [35]). Some reasons for considering ergodic dependence structure in data rather than a mixing structure are discussed in [36][37][38][39][40][41][42][43][44], where details on the definition of ergodic property of processes are given, as well as illustrative examples of such processes. One of the arguments used in [45] to justify the ergodic setting is that for certain classes of processes, proving ergodic properties rather than the mixing condition can be much easier.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%