2018
DOI: 10.1002/tesq.470
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

At the Crossroads of TESOL and English Medium Instruction

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
52
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 119 publications
(52 citation statements)
references
References 54 publications
(72 reference statements)
0
52
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Murata 2019) and special journal issues (e.g. Pecorari and Malmström 2018). An expanding phenomenon, EMI is still being defined and re-defined as an object of study.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Murata 2019) and special journal issues (e.g. Pecorari and Malmström 2018). An expanding phenomenon, EMI is still being defined and re-defined as an object of study.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…EMI instructors operating in such contexts should feel obliged to take advantage of these affordances in order to enhance learning and content mastery in their classes. However, to meet the broader goals of internationalization, EMI instructors must also be versed in fundamental aspects of second language learning and teaching (Pecorari & Malmström, 2018), as well as intercultural communication (Kim, 2009;Kramsch, 2011).…”
Section: Contextual Relativitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Planning for EMI programs involves stakeholders from multiple academic departments with diverse disciplinary traditions and may draw on in its execution perspectives from experts in fields as far ranging as international relations, political science, history, anthropology, linguistics, and education. Important goals for EMI teacher education, therefore, include raising awareness of the complexity of EMI implementation, In subsequent meetings, the complexity of EMI (i.e., challenges, relative advantages and disadvantages) was discussed with reference to issues raised in recent papers by notable EMI scholars (e.g., Kling, 2019;Macaro et al, 2018;Pecorari & Malmström, 2018). Two examples include threshold levels of English language proficiency needed for teaching EMI classes and the potential for 'domain loss' as a result of the increasing preference for research published in English (Shohamy, 2013;Toh, 2016) Taken together, the range of knowledge bases that might inform the implementation of EMI point to an exceptionally inter-or perhaps transdisciplinary enterprise (Douglas Fir Group, 2016).…”
Section: Interdisciplinarity and Emimentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In Higher Education contexts, the teaching of content subjects through a second language has very often been equated to the use of English as the vehicular language for instruction. Pecorari and Malmström (2018) define the main features of EMI programmes emphasising the following: 1) for most participants in this type of setting, English is a second language (L2), 2) English is the language used for instructional purposes, 3) English itself is usually not a subject being taught and 4) language development is not a primary intended outcome. Macaro et al attribute the prominent role of English, rather than other second languages, at universities to "the status of English as a lingua franca in a more global world, heightened institutional competition, internationalization at home […] and faculty requirements to publish in highly ranked English-medium journals" (2019,105).…”
Section: Introduction and Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%