“…Planning for EMI programs involves stakeholders from multiple academic departments with diverse disciplinary traditions and may draw on in its execution perspectives from experts in fields as far ranging as international relations, political science, history, anthropology, linguistics, and education. Important goals for EMI teacher education, therefore, include raising awareness of the complexity of EMI implementation, In subsequent meetings, the complexity of EMI (i.e., challenges, relative advantages and disadvantages) was discussed with reference to issues raised in recent papers by notable EMI scholars (e.g., Kling, 2019;Macaro et al, 2018;Pecorari & Malmström, 2018). Two examples include threshold levels of English language proficiency needed for teaching EMI classes and the potential for 'domain loss' as a result of the increasing preference for research published in English (Shohamy, 2013;Toh, 2016) Taken together, the range of knowledge bases that might inform the implementation of EMI point to an exceptionally inter-or perhaps transdisciplinary enterprise (Douglas Fir Group, 2016).…”