2010
DOI: 10.1002/9781444317589
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Atlas of the Diabetic Foot

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
32
0
6

Year Published

2012
2012
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 39 publications
(38 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
32
0
6
Order By: Relevance
“…The most widely recognized classification is the Wagner system, which grades ulcers from 0 to 5 based largely on ulcer depth and severity [10,11]. The severity of diabetic foot infections ranges from mild and self-limited to limb-and even life threatening [12,13].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The most widely recognized classification is the Wagner system, which grades ulcers from 0 to 5 based largely on ulcer depth and severity [10,11]. The severity of diabetic foot infections ranges from mild and self-limited to limb-and even life threatening [12,13].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…5 Triad of neuropathy, angiopathy and trauma will make the patients of DM more vulnerable to diabetic foot ulcer. 6 It is estimated that 15% of the patients suffering from DM will suffer from diabetic foot ulcer (DFU) in their lifetime. 7 In the absence of proper and aggressive treatment of DFU it may further progress to necrosis and gangrene and finally end up in limb amputation.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The risk of ulceration and amputation among patients with diabetes regardless of the type of diabetes increases by 2-4 folds with the progression of age and duration of diabetes. [38] Foot ulceration can be prevented by almost up to 70% through programs that could reduce its risk factors, where simple interventions can reduce amputations. [39] As Figure 10 suggests, 40% of respondents have had a form of foot problem with highest incident of leg pain and numbness.…”
Section: Foot Condition Among Surveyed Population and Applied Methods mentioning
confidence: 99%