1989
DOI: 10.1086/132453
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Atmospheric and facility seeing on Mauna Kea, Hawaii

Abstract: Seeing data obtained quasi-simultaneously at the University of Hawaii 2.2-m telescope and at the Canada-France-Hawaii 3.6-m telescope (Henry et al. 1987) are compared and interpreted in terms of telescope aberrations (FWHM -0.5 arc sec), facility seeing ((FWHM) -0.6 arc sec), and atmospheric seeing ((FWHM)) -0.5 arc sec).

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2002
2002
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
3
1

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 7 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In their analysis of the performances of SpeX during its first years of operation, Rayner et al (2004) noted that observing away from the parallactic angle can induce a slope variation of about 7% across the 2.5 μm baseline. However, the authors used a narrower slit of 0 3, against 0 8 in our case (i.e., larger than the average seeing of ∼0 5 at Maunakea; e.g., Racine 1989 and the Appendix). We therefore stress that our conclusions are only valid in the case of observations conducted with the wider 0 8 slit, the most commonly used slit in spectroscopic surveys of asteroids.…”
Section: Systematic Errorsmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…In their analysis of the performances of SpeX during its first years of operation, Rayner et al (2004) noted that observing away from the parallactic angle can induce a slope variation of about 7% across the 2.5 μm baseline. However, the authors used a narrower slit of 0 3, against 0 8 in our case (i.e., larger than the average seeing of ∼0 5 at Maunakea; e.g., Racine 1989 and the Appendix). We therefore stress that our conclusions are only valid in the case of observations conducted with the wider 0 8 slit, the most commonly used slit in spectroscopic surveys of asteroids.…”
Section: Systematic Errorsmentioning
confidence: 96%